Shocking Report on COVID Vaccine Adverse Effects: the Roll-Out Continues Anyway

After two National Health Services (NHS) workers in the UK experienced severe allergic reactions to the new Pfizer COVID vaccine, which now has been approved in the US, the regulator warned that “People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine.” The NHS further advised that resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations and that vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.

The two vaccine companies, Pfizer and BioNTech, excluded people from their drug trials with a history of allergic reactions. Therefore, the performance of the vaccine looked safer than it will in the rollout. Past efforts to introduce RNA technology have failed, because serious autoimmune reactions occurred. The three major clinical trials of COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) were designed to prevent nothing more than a “mild case of COVID-19.” That means a cough, or chills and fever. But cough, chills and fever usually are cured naturally, which means there is no need for a vaccine. -GEG

From the UK, The Guardian has the story [1]: “People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine, the medicines regulator has said, after two NHS workers experienced symptoms on Wednesday.”

They just figured this out? Now?

The Guardian is referring to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, which has just been approved in the US.

Two people experiencing significant adverse effects may not sound important, particularly since they already a history of allergic reactions, but the following quote in the Guardian article raises major red flags a mile high:

“The MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] advice states: ‘Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine. Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available’.”

First of all, a very large number of people have a history of allergic reactions to a vaccine or medicine or food. Automatically, these people should not take the vaccine. But how many people in the general public are aware of this restriction?

Second, with the operation to vaccinate hundreds of millions of people running at top speed, who actually believes that many locations where shots are given will have the necessary resuscitation equipment on hand? Sheer insanity.

Then, on top of all this, we have a bombshell statement from the Denver Post [2]: “Documents published by the two [vaccine] companies [Pfizer and BioNTech] showed that people with a history of severe allergic reactions were excluded from the [clinical vaccine] trials, and doctors were advised to look out for such reactions in trial participants who weren’t previously known to have severe allergies.”

In other words, the clinical trials were already biased, because they excluded people with a history of allergic reactions. Therefore, the performance of the vaccine looked safer. Therefore, no one would find out that allergic reactions to the vaccine are a MAJOR danger.

And NOW, as if it’s nothing more than an afterthought, we get—“Oh, by the way, if people have allergies, they shouldn’t take the vaccine.”

Why don’t regulators simply admit, “This vaccine is as disastrous as possible, but we can’t let that cat out of the bag.”

I have written about the inherent dangers of the new experimental RNA technology deployed with this COVOD vaccine. The world population is a vast group of guinea pigs. Past efforts to introduce RNA tech have failed because serious autoimmune reactions have occurred. [3] The body basically attacks itself.

What rational person would line up to take this shot?

You have to ask yourself why some Pittsburgh and Chicago medical centers aren’t making the new COVID vaccine mandatory for their own healthcare workers. [4] [5]

Read full article here…

The US Supreme Court Rejected the Lawsuit from Texas Challenging the Election, and Biden Won the Electoral Vote, But Trump Still Has Options to Reverse Everything

On Friday, the Supreme Court decided that Texas “lacked standing” to challenge the elections in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin under Article 3 of the US Constitution. In this way, the Court essentially side stepped the issue. However, if Trump is able to present evidence of election fraud to the Supreme Court, and if the Court acknowledges that evidence, there is the possibility that Biden would be disqualified, and Trump would serve a second term.

The contested election is not over. Several states sent Republican Electors to cast alternate votes. Vice President Pence will have full authority as president of the Senate on January 6, the day the Electoral votes are officially counted, and he will accept or reject motions to decide the next steps. If that happens, President Trump could be reelected by Congress because each state represented in the House is allowed only one vote, and the majority of state delegations are Republican.

In another scenario, litigation in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Arizona may result in more Electoral votes for Trump, who has 232 votes at this time.

Finally, Trump signed an executive order giving himself power to invoke the Insurrection Act, which amounts to martial law, if there was foreign interference in the election. The fact that the presidential votes were counted by machines outside the United States and operated by non-US companies is sufficient basis for the claim of foreign interference. -GEG

Additional sources:

Gateway Pundit:  https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/michigans-matt-sealy-explains-president-trump-several-paths-victorynever-count-donald-trump-video/

Ron Paul Institute:  http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2020/december/15/the-supreme-court-had-one-last-chance-to-keep-the-american-republic-together-it-failed/

CDC Reveals Hospitals Counted Heart Attacks as COVID-19 Deaths

The numbers from the CDC reveal hospitals have been counting patients who died from serious preexisting conditions as COVID-19 deaths. In October, the CDC revealed that few people have died from Covid-19. Instead, other causes of death were falsely diagnosed as Covid-19. Out of 220,000 claimed Covid-19 deaths, 88,208 were patients who died from pneumonia and the flu, 17,798 died from chronic respiratory diseases, 26,365 died from adult chronic distress syndrome, and over 51,000 patients died from heart attacks. Over 131,000 cases diagnosed as Covid-19 deaths already had life-threatening diseases such as cancer, dementia, and even end-stage renal failure. Over 10,000 people who died and were marked as Covid-19 cases were already in hospice and waiting to die. Only 6% of Covid deaths were caused by the coronavirus as the other 94% were linked to pre-existing comorbidities, serious illnesses and advanced age.

The CARES Act that was passed by Congress in March gave hospitals a 20% bonus for COVID diagnosis, paid for by Medicare. Doctors are paid to list patients as having COVID-19 without any indication that the death was related to it.

Most of the people who died during the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918 actually died from bacterial pneumonia.

From the CDC:


Table 3 shows the types of health conditions and contributing causes mentioned in conjunction with deaths involving coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.9 additional conditions or causes per death. The number of mentions for each condition or cause is shown for all deaths and by age groups.

Additional information from our previous post:  https://needtoknow.news/2020/09/cdc-data-shows-only-6-of-covid-19-deaths-listed-the-virus-as-the-sole-cause-of-death/

Technology Expert Can Determine in Seconds If Ballots Are Legitimate Or Fake

Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, who holds impressive patents on his inventions including the QR scanning application that is on 12-billion devices worldwide, explains how millions of ballots can be digitally examined in a day to prove whether they are are authentic. His approach, rather than trying to discover voting machines’ codes, examines physical artifacts from multiple scanning touch points that are placed on mail-in ballots at various points along their processing paths. He says fraudulent ballots lack these essential marks. He says that Trump’s attorneys need to use this method to audit the physical and digital ballots that now are in question. -GEG