Is COVID-19 Being Blamed for 5G Radiation Sickness?

Tokyo Bay, Japan: Japanese health officials pronounced that 10 persons on board the Diamond Princess were diagnosed as having Covid-19 on February 5, 2020. The ship was ordered quarantined for 14 days. Within 8 days, a total of 218 people were diagnosed with having Covid-19. A little known fact is that the Diamond Princess was sporting new 5G towers. Outbreaks were discovered only on the ships that had 5G installed.

Dr. Magda Havas, Ph.D, performed a study comparing the average number of cases, deaths, and tests for Covid-19 in states with and without 5G. She reported that Covid cases are 95% higher and Covid deaths 126% higher in states with 5G than in states without 5G.

A Spanish study found that countries with 5G had 220% more Covid-19 infections than countries without 5G. San Marino, a micro-state next to Italy, was the first European state to adopt 5G technology and had virtually no regulations on its use. San Marino now has the highest incident of Covid-19 in Europe, with a rate 27 times greater than the infection rate in Croatia, which is free from 5G. [Coincidence? We don’t think so, either.] -GEG

On February 5, the Diamond Princess was boarded at port Yokohama in Tokyo Bay by Japanese health officials. Those health officials pronounced that 10 persons on board were diagnosed as having coronavirus, later known as COVID-19. The ship was ordered quarantined for 14 days. Nobody could leave the ship during the quarantine period. Within 3 days another 125 passengers were diagnosed with having COVID-19). By February 13, a total of 218 people were diagnosed with having COVID-19.

A little known fact is that the Diamond Princess was sporting some new high tech 5G towers. An earlier news release explained that “Princess Cruises has announced a new dimension in its connectivity partnership with SES and will become the first global cruise ship fleet with early access to SES’s O3b mPOWER network augmenting the Princess Medallion Class experience as it scales across the fleet, according to a press release.” Cruise Industry News, February 3, 2020.

Is there a connection between the newly installed 5G network on the ship and the passengers being struck ill with coronavirus? It should be noted that only the Princess cruise line that had installed the 5G had outbreaks of COVID-19. In March 2020, the Grand Princess had outbreaks of COVID-19 before docking in San Francisco. The Ruby Princess was reported to have had an outbreak of COVID-19 involving 600 passengers prior to docking on March 19, 2020, at Sydney, Australia. All of those ships are Medallion Class ships with the new 5G tower connectivity from SES’s O3b mPOWER.

Read full article here…

Additional source:

Dr. Magda havas study:
https://magdahavas.com/5g-and-mm-waves/is-there-an-association-between-covid-19-cases-deaths-and-5g-in-the-united-states/

Retracted paper on 5G about health effects:    https://greatmountainpublishing.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FIORANELLI-5G-Cause-of-COVID-19.pdf



President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil Refuses to Take Any COVID-19 Vaccine Ever

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said late this week that under no circumstances would he ever take a coronavirus vaccine – especially not a Chinese-made shot, and he has warned his countrymen repeatedly that the Chinese vaccines are dangerous. A few weeks ago, Brazil temporarily halted trials for the Chinese-made vaccine produced Sinovac when a volunteer died, but it was reported to be unrelated to the vaccine trial. Bolsonaro was furious when the trial was allowed to resume less than 48 hours later. Sao Paolo has already agreed to start importing millions of doses of Sinovac’s jab, despite resistance from the president. Bolsonaro was quoted saying, “I’m telling you, I’m not going to take it. It’s my right.”

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said late this week that under no circumstances would he ever take a coronavirus vaccine – especially not a Chinese-made jab.

The right-wing leader has repeatedly warned his countrymen that Chinese vaccines are dangerous and should be avoided. A few weeks ago, Brazil temporarily halted trials for the Chinese-made vaccine produced Sinovac. Still, Bolsonaro was furious when the trial was allowed to resume less than 48 hours later. Sao Paolo has already agreed to start importing millions of doses of Sinovac’s jab, despite resistance from Bolsonaro.

Now, Reuters reports, Bolsonaro said Thursday evening in a public statement broadcast across multiple social media channels that he would not take the COVID vaccine, the latest in a series of statements he has made expressing skepticism toward certain vaccination programs. In statements broadcast live over multiple social media platforms, Bolsonaroadded that Congress was unlikely to require Brazilians to take a vaccine.

“I’m telling you, I’m not going to take it. It’s my right,” he said.

Brazil has the second highest number of coronavirus deaths in the world, and it’s also far and away the worst hit country in Latin America.

Bolsonaro has for months played down the seriousness of the pandemic despite having been infected with the virus in July. Bolsonaro also expressed skepticism over the effectiveness of wearing masks during his speech, implying there was little conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of masks.

Read full article here…




Iran’s Top Nuclear Scientist Was Assassinated by a 62-Person Hit Squad

Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, Iran’s top nuclear scientist who led Iran’s “Amad,” or “Hope” nuclear program, was shot dead by as 12 gunmen who pounced on him after setting off a car bomb. Many others, including relatives who were traveling with him were reported to be killed. Iran blames Israel for the murder. Four Iranian nuclear scientists were assassinated between 2010 to 2012, and, in 2015, Israeli Defense minister Moshe Ya’alon “hinted” that Israel was responsible for those assassinations. Some critics believe Netanyahu is provoking Iran so that it will retaliate and the US may be goaded into attacking Iran. Moon Over Alabama wrote that the purpose of the killing was to stop the nuclear deal with Iran dead in its tracks before president elect Joe Biden comes into office. Tehran long has maintained its nuclear program is peaceful, and the International Atomic Energy Agency says that Fakhrizadeh-led “Amad” program ended in 2003.

Today the top Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fahrizade was assassinated in a complex terror attack while driving on a highway in Absard, a small city just east of Tehran. An explosion stopped his car. Then shots were fired at him from two directions.

Between 2010 and 2012 four other nuclear scientist in Iran were assassinated in similar ways.

There is little doubt about who is responsible for this attack:

Fakhrizadeh was named by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2018 as the director of Iran’s nuclear weapons project.When Netanyahu revealed then that Israel had removed from a warehouse in Tehran a vast archive of Iran’s own material detailing with its nuclear weapons program, he said: “Remember that name, Fakhrizadeh.”

According to the IAEA Iran did not and does not have a nuclear weapons program. More than 20 years back some Iranian scientists did an organizational study about what they would have to do to create a nuclear weapons program. But politics intervened and the program was never launched.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has since its establishment rejected all weapons of mass destruction out of religious reasons. Its leader Ayatollah Khamenei has issued a fatwa the prohibits any attempts to develop, produce or otherwise introduce such weapons.

While a terror attack against its top nuclear scientist can be seen as an act of war Iran is unlikely to openly take revenge for it. Doing such would only play into Netanyahoo’s hands as he attempts to goad the U.S. into an attack on Iran.

The assassination of Mohsen Fahrizade does not aim at Iran’s nuclear program. Its purpose is to assassinate the nuclear deal with Iran before president elect Joe Biden comes into office.

Read full article here…

Additional sources:

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=61933

https://nypost.com/2020/11/29/irans-mohsen-fakhrizadeh-killed-hit-squad-report-says/




Pennsylvania Supreme Court Removes Lower Court Order Preventing State from Certifying Election

Last week, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf said he had certified Democrat Joe Biden as the winner of the presidential election in his state. The next day, Judge Patricia McCullough halted certification of any remaining contests, including contests for Congress. The Pennsylvania trial court ruled the 2020 election was likely unconstitutional in Pennsylvania, and that gives state legislators power to choose electors. On Saturday, however, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court threw out Judge McCullough’s order preventing the state from certifying the election. The basis for that action was that the plaintiffs failed to file their case in a “timely manner” in 2019 when the legislation was passed. The problem with that explanation is that, if the plaintiffs had challenged the statute BEFORE the election, the court would have thrown out the suit saying there was no injury in fact. The case is poised to go to the US Supreme Court. -GEG

Pennsylvania’s highest court on Saturday night threw out a lower court’s order preventing the state from certifying dozens of contests on its Nov. 3 election ballot in the latest lawsuit filed by Republicans attempting to thwart President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the battleground state.

The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, threw out the three-day-old order, saying the underlying lawsuit was filed months after the law allowed for challenges to Pennsylvania’s expansive year-old mail-in voting law.

Read full article here…

Additional sources:

Gateway Pundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-tosses-gop-lawsuit-absentee-ballots-lifts-block-certification-election/

Newswars  https://www.newswars.com/pa-judge-declares-pa-election-likely-unconstitutional-over-mail-in-ballots-gives-state-legislators-power-to-choose-electors/




Vermont Governor Instructs Schools to Interrogate Students about Family Thanksgiving Gatherings


Vermont Governor Phil Scott, a Republican, announced on Twitter last week that schools have been directed to ask students or parents if they were part of multi-family gatherings. If the answer is yes, he wrote that they will need to “go remote” and quarantine for 14 days, or take a COVID-19 test in which case the quarantine will be seven days. Governor Scott said the same policy should apply to businesses whose employees celebrated the Thanksgiving holidays with friends and family.

Oregon Governor Kate Brown encouraged citizens to call the police on their neighbors if they violate her executive order that limits in-home gatherings to six-people. People who violate Brown’s orders could face misdemeanor penalties up to 30 days in jail, fines of up to $1,250, or both. -GEG

Vermont Gov. Phil Scott is giving schools the green light to interrogate students about their Thanksgiving activities following the break.

According to Scott, students or parents who admit to violating the state’s holiday travel and gathering rules will be forced to participate in online school for two weeks, he announced via Twitter on Tuesday. The penalty will be reduced to one week if the students in question take a COVID-19 test.

The same quarantine method, Scott claimed, should apply to businesses whose employees decide to celebrate the Thanksgiving holidays with friends and family.

“This isn’t a way around the ban or an excuse to get together,” he wrote. “The more we adhere to this policy, the faster we’ll lower case counts & ease up on restrictions.”

Scott also announced that COVID-19 the cancellation of school sports until further notice, pinning the responsibility of mitigating coronavirus spread on parents of school-age children.

“I hope adults realize the need to sacrifice to give our kids these experiences and keep them in school as much as possible,” he wrote.

Read full article here…




Judge Blocks, then Unblocks Georgia from Wiping or Resetting Election Machines


Federal Judge Timothy Batten presided over a major election lawsuit in Georgia and issued an order directing the state to cease and desist wiping or resetting election machines. But hours later, the judge reversed his orders, explaining that the defendants who represent the State of Georgia are not in possession of the machines, and that county officials have custody of the machines. Attorney Lin Wood was flabbergasted and pointed out that the machines are owned by the state and that the Georgia secretary of state administers elections. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit, represented by Sidney Powell, filed an emergency motion as an election official stated the ballot-counting machines would be reset to zero on Monday, November 30, before performing a recount. The lawsuit makes a number of allegations regarding the voting machines and software supplied by Dominion Voting Systems, which is used in Georgia and many other states. -GEG

Authored by Ivan Pentchoukov and Petr Svab via The Epoch Times,

A federal judge presiding over a major election lawsuit in Georgia on Sunday issued and then reversed an order directing the state to cease and desist wiping or resetting election machines.

“Defendants are ordered to maintain the status quo & are temporarily enjoined from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the State of Georgia until further order of the court,” Judge Timothy Batten wrote in an emergency order issued Nov. 29.

The judge reversed the order not long after, explaining that the defendants are not in possession of the machines.

“Plaintiffs’ request fails because the voting equipment that they seek to impound is in the possession of county election officials. Any injunction the Court issues would extend only to Defendants and those within their control, and Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that county election officials are within Defendants’ control. Defendants cannot serve as a proxy for local election officials against whom the relief should be sought,” the judge wrote.

The change of course by the judge drew a flabbergasted response from Lin Wood, an attorney associated with the Trump campaign.

“What??? Judge reversed order based on Defendants’ claim that GA Counties control voting machines,” Wood wrote on Twitter, adding that the machines are owned by the state and that the Georgia secretary of state administers elections.

“Why are GA officials determined to wipe these machines clean [by] resetting them?”

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit on Sunday filed an emergency motion which included an affidavit featuring a Nov. 25 message from an election official stating that the ballot-counting machines would be reset to zero on Monday, Nov. 30, before performing a recount.

Read full article here…




Trump Administration Removes War Hawks from Defense Policy Board, Including Henry Kissinger



The Trump administration removed globalists and war hawks from the Defense Policy Board, an outside group of national security officials who give advice on defense policy, that includes Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger, Jane Harman and Eric Cantor. Madeleine Albright famously argued that killing 500,000 Iraqi children was a reasonable foreign-policy move when she was the Secretary of State under President Bill Clinton. Henry Kissinger is known for prolonging the Vietnam War.

The Trump administration removed globalists and warhawks from the Defense Policy Board on Wednesday including Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger, Jane Harman and Eric Cantor.

That was long overdue.

Madeleine Albright is famous for bribing the North Korean dictators with US cash in a failed peace agreement.
She also famously argued that killing 500,000 Iraqi children was a good foreign policy move.

Here is a much forgotten exchange between Lesley Stahl and Madeleine Albright on “60 Minutes” back on May 12, 1996 that is not getting much play lately:

Lesley Stahl on U.S. sanctions against Iraq: We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?

Secretary of State Madeleine Albright: I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.

Read full article here…




COVID-19 Deaths Are Said to Be Off the Charts, But Total Deaths Remain the Same. That Is Not Possible.

Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), gave a webinar presentation comparing COVID-19 deaths with other causes of death. Using data obtained from the CDC, she discovered that, while the number of deaths rose drastically for COVID-19, all other causes declined by about the same number. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia have been recategorized as deaths from COVID-19.

Yanni Gu, a student at JHU, wrote an article summarizing these findings and noted that patients dying from other diseases who also tested positive for COVID-19 are classified as COVID-19 deaths. The Johns Hopkins News-Letter, a student newspaper, retracted Yanni Gu’s article because it was contrary to information coming from the CDC and the WHO and, therefore, it was false. Furthermore, Briand is an economist, not a medical professional. -GEG

In a separate article, independent researcher Earl Wyatt found that it was nearly impossible to find the total number of deaths in the United States in 2020 beyond March. The data is being withheld. He wrote that he found a source that had numbers for state-by-state deaths at IndexMundi.com that does show total deaths for so far in 2020. Using those numbers he found that the total death rate from all causes is going down, not up. Clearly, there is no deadly pandemic underway. Wyatt wrote, “Any number less than an almost 10 percent increase from year to year indicates just how little coronavirus actually affected the nation, but it may have a significant effect on how we view the role of government in our lives and our dependence on elected officials.” -GEG

Original article: A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19

According to new data, the U.S. currently ranks first in total COVID-19 cases, new cases per day and deaths. Genevieve Briand, assistant program director of the Applied Economics master’s degree program at Hopkins, critically analyzed the effect of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in her webinar titled “COVID-19 Deaths: A Look at U.S. Data.”

From mid-March to mid-September, U.S. total deaths have reached 1.7 million, of which 200,000, or 12% of total deaths, are COVID-19-related. Instead of looking directly at COVID-19 deaths, Briand focused on total deaths per age group and per cause of death in the U.S. and used this information to shed light on the effects of COVID-19.

She explained that the significance of COVID-19 on U.S. deaths can be fully understood only through comparison to the number of total deaths in the United States.

After retrieving data on the CDC website, Briand compiled a graph representing percentages of total deaths per age category from early February to early September, which includes the period from before COVID-19 was detected in the U.S. to after infection rates soared.

Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19. Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

“The reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals,” Briand said.

Briand also noted that 50,000 to 70,000 deaths are seen both before and after COVID-19, indicating that this number of deaths was normal long before COVID-19 emerged. Therefore, according to Briand, not only has COVID-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths.

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

Read full article here…

From LiberalFirst:

Do the numbers justify the response?

I’m not one to buy into conspiracy theories or to try to create new ones, but I have to say searching for what should be very easy to find on the Internet seems to be intentionally made difficult, and I do not believe it is by accident.

If you want to frustrate yourself, Google “All deaths in the United States in 2020” and see if you receive the answer.

I will tell you what I found — absolutely nothing that would provide a single number of deaths in the United States in 2020 beyond March.

We get minute-by-minute counts on deaths related to COVID-19, but cannot receive a number of all deaths? Does that not seem strange to you.

I finally found a place that had numbers for state-by-state deaths and had to add them up, but I was able to find out on a running clock just how many people have died so far in 2020.

Why is this important?

The main reason is to find out the effect of the coronavirus on the nation, and to see if the Center for Disease Control’s assertion that coronavirus is causing a spike in the death rate is accurate.

It would be easy for the CDC to justify their claim — show the number of deaths in 2019 or 2018 or 2017 and compare those numbers to the total umber of deaths in 2020.

Since they haven’t done that, I will do it for them and share the data with you.

For a moment, let’s act like coronavirus never existed and see what the death rate should be for 2020 had we never experienced a pandemic.

To make any such projection, we would need to see trends from previous years.

In 2016, a total of 2,744,248 Americans died, according to the CDC. Here are the death rates of the past four years:

2016 — 2,744,248

2017 — 2,813,503

2018 — 2,839,205

2019 — 2,855,000

 

It is not hard to notice that the death rate has increased for three consecutive years.

Here are the increases each year:

2016 to 2017 — 69,255

2017 to 2018 — 25,702

2018 to 2019 — 15,795

 

The average increase of the past four years has been 36,917.

Based on the average and adding that to the death rate in 2019, we should be able to project the death rate in 2020 to be around 2,891,917.

So what is it so far?

It should be a simple number to find.

It’s not.

The CDC only reports the death rate from January to March.

I searched the Internet over to find anyone reporting any death numbers in the United States, and it is almost impossible.

https://liberalfirst.com/opinion/6714-do-the-numbers-justify-the-response

Additional source:

https://retractionwatch.com/2020/11/27/johns-hopkins-student-newspaper-deletes-then-retracts-article-on-faculty-members-presentation-about-covid-19-deaths/




Mixed Emotions Over Continued School Shutdowns

Continued shutdowns of schools across the US have caused an alarming decline in learning. In St. Paul, Minnesota, 40% of public high school students are failing; in Houston, 42% of students are failing at least two classes; in Fairfax, Virginia, there has been an 300% increase in middle school failures. Remote virtual learning on computers is not working. Special needs students are paying the highest price as they cannot get the extra help they need. Teachers’ unions have lobbied to keep schools closed. Joe Biden said that it will cost $150 to $200 billion to reopen schools across the US. [A counter current to this, not mentioned in the article, is that keeping kids out of the radicalizing influence of public schools has a bright side in that illiteracy is better than radicalization. Homeschooling is on the rise, and that may be the ultimate solution.] -GEG




Supreme Court Judge in UK Slams ‘Totalitarian’ COVID ‘Control Freaks’ In Government

Lord Sumption, a British Supreme Court judge from 2012 to 2018, wrote an opinion piece slamming the UK government as ‘control freaks’ for attempting to control people’s lives under the guise of COVID, and labeled it “morally and constitutionally indefensible”. He was responding to the government’s proposal to allow people to spend 5 days in the company of their relatives over Christmas, but with the caveat that in January they will have to pay back the privilege with 25 days more lockdown time. His comments come in the wake of reports that the government is planning to issue ‘freedom passes’ for people who agree to vaccination or twice testing negative for the virus in one week. -GEG

A British Supreme Court judge has slammed the UK government as ‘control freaks’ for attempting to control people’s lives under the guise of COVID, and labeled it “morally and constitutionally indefensible” to define what freedoms the public should and shouldn’t have.

In an op-ed published Sunday, Lord Sumption noted that the “debate about whether to let us have a family Christmas perfectly sums up what is wrong with this Government’s handling” of the crisis.

Sumption wrote that there are “many different answers to the dilemmas of a Covid Christmas”, yet the crux of the matter is “whether we should be allowed to make the choice for ourselves, instead of having it imposed on us by law.”

“But for the Jacobins of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and the control freaks in the Department of Health, theirs is the only answer,” Sumption urged.

The British government has posited allowing people to spend 5 days in the company of their relatives over Christmas, but with the caveat that in January they will have to pay back the privilege with more lockdown time, specifically another 25 days.

Read full article here…




Trump Lawyer Giuliani Presents Evidence of Election Fraud to Pennsylvania Legislature

The Pennsylvania state legislature held a hearing on the 2020 election irregularities on Wednesday. Trump attorney, Rudy Giuliani, said that 1.8-million mail-in ballots were sent out, but 2.5 million were counted. He further stated that 672,770 votes that were not inspected by anyone were secretly stuffed into the ballot box. A witness described the huge “spikes” in Pennsylvania ballots that went 600,000 to Joe Biden vs 3,200 for Trump. Witness Gregory Strenstrom, a forensic computer scientist, described how he personally observed dozens of USB cards being uploaded to voting machines which resulted in 50,000 votes for Joe Biden in a short period of time. He said he reported it to the sheriff and filed an objection with the clerk of elections. -GEG

The Pennsylvania state legislature on Wednesday held a hearing on the 2020 election issues and irregularities.

One very credible witness described how he personally observed dozens of USB cards being uploaded to voting machines which resulted in 50,000 votes for Joe Biden in a short period of time.

The witness introduced himself: “My name is Gregory Strenstrom, I am from Delaware county, former Commanding Officer in the Navy, veteran of foreign wars, CEO of my own private company, a data scientist & forensic computer scientist & an expert in security and fraud.”

“I was told that every election they leave a couple of USBs in the voting machines…after talking to law enforcement I found out that was not the case, that more than two [USBs] is unusual — so, they denied they did it but as of today, 47 USB cards are missing and they’re no where to be found…so I was told personally that these cards that were uploaded…they didn’t update the vote live in real time,” Strenstrom said.

He continued, “They only uploaded about once every 2 or 3 hours. I demanded they updated the vote so I could see what the result was and it was 50,000 votes — and as a computer scientist, an American and a patriot it doesn’t matter who those 50,000 votes were — I’ll tell you they were for Biden but what was shocking to me as an American and someone who has gone to sea, gone to war that could even happen.”

Read full article here…




Supreme Court Rules Against NY Governor Cuomo’s Limits on Religious Services


The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the a Catholic diocese and Orthodox Jews who were seeking to block New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s limits on attendance at houses of worship. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote:”…while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques.” -GEG

The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Catholic Diocese and Orthodox Jews who were seeking to block New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s authoritarian attendance limits on houses of worship.

On Wednesday evening, the Supreme Court voted 5 to 4 in favor of religious freedom, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and the court’s three liberal members dissenting.

The court decided that Gov. Cuomo’s restrictions violated the First Amendment’s protection of the free exercise of religion. The New York Times reports that Justice Neil M. Gorsuch said Cuomo had treated secular activities more favorably than religious ones.

“It is time — past time — to make plain that, while the pandemic poses many grave challenges, there is no world in which the Constitution tolerates color-coded executive edicts that reopen liquor stores and bike shops but shutter churches, synagogues, and mosques,” Justice Gorsuch wrote.

Read full article here…