The virologists introduced solutions they say contain the virus into a variety of tissue cultures, including three that contained human cells. None of the human cells became infected, and is, therefore, harmless to humans. The only tissue cultures that did become infected were monkey kidney cells that were treated with two potent drugs that are toxic to kidneys.
This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.
The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:
“Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.”
What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test. The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus. The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus. Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice. The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur. They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.
The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.
Didn’t have time to read this yet but based upon the title and a scan I’ll say that these simian cell lines have been in vaxxes administered to humanity for some decades now. These affect CD4+Tcell immunity and 6% population is very sick due to this criminal activity.
Talk about New World Order, yikes! Maybe this is the reason every nation – save Sweden – went along with the Covid-19 draconian lockdown measures, the leaders were either paid off or didn’t want to be locked up themselves!
https://freenorth.news/2020/10/14/canadas-global-reset-plan-leaked/
Polio vaccine brought us HIV this vaccine will bring something new. I wonder if flu vaccine recipients were susceptible to Covid ???
They were and are:
‘FLU VACCINE SIGNIFICANTLY ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK OF CORONAVIRUS’ and
‘POSITIVE ASSOCIATION FOUND BETWEEN COVID19 DEATHS AND FLU SHOT RATES WORLDWIDE IN ELDERLY POPULATION’ and
‘MILITARY STUDY SHOWS 36% HIGHER ODDS OF ACUTE COVID19 INFECTION AMONG FLU VAX RECIPIENTS’ and
‘Many Other Published Articles
I’ve been aware of this conclusion for some time now, thanks to Jon Rappoport’s blogs but my question to him and now you is, ‘then what is making all these people sick?’. I suspect in the beginning it was fear that manifested itself into physical symptoms but now I’m wondering if it’s just the good ole seasonal flu that they are now calling COVID.
My Q exactly. Hope you get an answer
I suggest you read Dr.Tom Cowan’s new book, “The Contagion Myth” for an answer. The best evidence points to millimeter wave EMF technology (“5G” for 5th Generation wireless communication technology.)
(I also recommend you look at the work of Dr. Andrew Kaufman)
you can get it at barnes and noble (amazon banned it!… gee wonder why…?!)
I looking for more info on long term Cortisol exposure in humans. Fear is accociated with the primal ‘fight or flight’ response wherein Cortisol are released at higher levels. This leads to the immune system being put on the back bench, although for an insignificant time period. However, if Cortisol is realised over a longer period of time, even at a lower level as when the brain initially registers fear, it could lead to the immune system being suppressed over a longer time. If this can be proven, then an average flu could be deadly. Especially in the modern human… Read more »
The first thought that came to my mind was if this virus is connected with the monkey kidney cells that has been the ingredient in the polio vaccines and monkey kidney tissues that has also been listed as one of the ingredients on vaccine ingredient list? It has already been proven that the monkey kidney cells in the SV40 used in the late 1950s and early 1960s were contaminated with a virus called simian virus 40 (SV40) present in monkey kidney cells used to grow the vaccine. This has been associated with one who had the vaccine developing cancer latter… Read more »
That does not Match Didier Raoult lab analysis that found cov2 disappeared in May with the end of the bell shaped death curve. Successive virus mutations have followed, it was iteration number 4 in september, now think for yourself which story fits better the reality we can observe. Note: PCR can’t differentiate all these mutations).
Vero monkey kidney cells…they used them to culture the polio vaccine they gave to Africans that subsequently came down with HIV (a mutation of SIV caused by SV-40). If I recall correctly. So are people with HIV or analogs of HIV (certain autoimmune disorders) supposed to be more vulnerable to this? I’m going on scant memory, but Mikovits, in her two interviews on Thomas Paine Podcast (mike moore) was ranting (in a good way) about how SarsCov2 doesn’t cause Covid-19 but she was moving fast over my head. and she mentioned that infected Vero monkey kidney cells from Fort Detrick… Read more »
Great article, thanks! What I am interested though is if the ‘virus’ could be the net-product of poisoned cells. In general virusses are not considered as alive. The only way they could enter the host cell, would surely be if the cell itself allowed it? Thus when the cells are poisoned, could it be that the virus are formed in an attempt to survive or as coded warning other cells? Has virusses ever been randomly found, ‘isolated’ and sequence in nature or has virusses only ever been found, ‘isolated’ and sequenced in the event of deseace?
I’m back and a little more skeptical than before. Above they state only 37 base pairs were identified. Here’s the actual quote from the study, “We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.” To me that suggests not 37 base pairs, but 37 PCRs, which I’m assuming that each one captures many base pairs at once. Color me confused….