Patreon’s Ban of Comic Owen Benjamin Could Cost Them $20-Million

image_pdfimage_print
Patreon, a fan-funding platform, lost in court and now must arbitrate 72 individual cases from former backers of comedian Owen Benjamin after the company banned the comic for ‘hate speech’. What Patreon failed to anticipate is that, according to its own terms of service, Benjamin’s fans could file arbitration claims against the company for disrupting their economic relationship with him. When Benjamin encouraged his fans to file claims, 72 of them took the hint and did exactly that. Because the cases were filed in California, Patreon has to pay the arbitration filing fees upfront on each separate case and other legal fees. Altogether, this could cost as much as $20-million regardless of the outcome. Patreon cannot survive that. -GEG

A court has issued a final ruling denying fan-funding platform Patreon’s request for an injunction against 72 former backers of comedian Owen Benjamin who are seeking arbitration against the company for disrupting the economic relationship between themselves and Benjamin.

The final ruling follows a tentative ruling against Patreon from earlier this month and means that the company now has to pay upfront filing fees on each of the 72 individual arbitration claims within 30 days of the due date on the invoice. These fees can be upwards of $10,000 per arbitration.

When the arbitration commences, Patreon will also have to pay further legal fees and have a rolling obligation to pay them within 30 days. Lawyer, commentator, and producer Mike Cernovich has predicted that these fees could be as high as $20 million.

In the final ruling, the court cited three reasons for denying Patreon’s request for an injunction.

First, the court wrote that Patreon “fails to show that it will suffer any irreparable injury or interim harm” if it’s not granted the injunction and noted that “merely having to incur expense in order to participate in arbitration proceedings is not irreparable harm.”

Second, the court wrote that “Patreon fails to show a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on its claims” and added that even if the claims are “not arbitrable,” “those issues are for the arbitrators, not the court, to decide.”

Third, the court wrote that “California courts rarely grant the extraordinary relief Patreon seeks here” and noted that once a dispute is submitted to arbitration, “the [California Arbitration Act] contemplates limited, if any, judicial involvement.” The court added that “typically, those who enter into arbitration agreements expect that their dispute will be resolved without necessity for any contact with the courts” and “that conclusion is ‘especially true’ where, as here, ‘the arbitration began without the need to seek a court order compelling arbitration.’”

Not only does the ruling mean Patreon has to pay these likely substantial fees but the ruling also gives users a legal avenue to defend against censorship under this California arbitration law.

Under this law, the drafting party of employment or consumer arbitration agreements has to pay the arbitration fees and they can’t reclaim the fees, regardless of the outcome. This means that companies such as Patreon, that force arbitration through their terms of service, risk potentially huge arbitration fees when they ban users because the former backers of these users can seek arbitration over “tortious interference” (disrupting the economic relationship between the creators and their backers).

For deplatformed users that had hundreds or thousands of backers when they were banned, this could leave these companies liable for millions of dollars in arbitration fees.

Lawyer Nick Rekieta said that this case is likely to act as a warning to Big Tech companies that deplatform their users:

“This is an extremely important case and what just happened is a shot across the bow of Big Tech companies. Your terms of service are binding upon you at least in so far as these arbitration and anti-class action provisions and we can use them against them.

That is important because this is how we defend ourselves from things like deplatforming, from things like cancel culture, and it is a big win in this sphere.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Freedom

The Integrity Project (TIP): A Blueprint for Democrats to Steal the 2020 Election, Linked to George Soros

The Transition Integrity Project (TIP), reportedly funded by Soros, prepared for a clear Trump win with a plan for Joe Biden to refuse to concede, while expecting the military to force Trump out of office. A “street fight,” would be advised in this scenario rather than legal battles or “elites observing norms.”

Kakistocracy

DHS Secretary Chad Wolf Says White Supremacists Are Biggest Threat to US

September 25, 2020 Reuters 2

Last week, FBI Director Chris Wray testified before Congress that his agency looks at Antifa as an ideology or movement, not an organization. Just about everyone in the country except the FBI knows this is not true. The FBI is protecting Antifa, allowing it to create chaos and terror throughout the nation.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bootstrap
bootstrap
1 month ago

We can only hope. But the predators-that-be have total control of everything “official” at this point, so expect one of their goons or packs-of-predators to protect big-tech tyranny.

Angelica
Angelica
1 month ago

I’d like to see Fakebook and Google sued.

trackback
Interview 1568 – New World Next Week with James Evan Pilato | altnews.org
1 month ago

[…] Story #2: Patreon’s Ban of Comic Owen Benjamin Could Cost Them $20 Million […]

Christopher Edwards
Christopher Edwards
1 month ago

Well it looks like their own guidelines was used against them and they got what was coming to them for doing such nonsense as that. But as the bible says you reap what you sow and that’s a fact of life my friend.