US Supreme Court Has Ruled that Forced Vaccines Are Constitutional

Pixabay
image_pdfimage_print
Attorney Alan Dershowitz says we have no Constitutional protection against being forcibly vaccinated because no one has a right to spread a deadly disease. This issue was decided by the US Supreme Court  long ago in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, in which the Court said the state has an obligation to use force, if necessary, to protect the lives of its citizens against the threat of a deadly disease. [This is a proper position, because the defense of life is one of the few proper functions of a just state. That is why we warn our activist friends not to overdo their claim that shutdowns and forced vaccines violate their constitutional rights. If their lawsuits ever get into the courts, they will lose.

The problem is that this position is justified only if the deadly threat is real and not staged as a political ploy, and those who are staging the hoax are the ones who will decide that it is real. Those who challenge them will be imprisoned for spreading false information that endangers public health and safety. Furthermore, in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts the Court said the threat doesn’t even need to be real if those making the decision believe it is. That part of the ruling provided a loophole big enough to drive a truck through because it allows political criminals to escape punishment simply by claiming they had bad advice.

So forget the Constitutional argument, folks, and focus on increasing public awareness of the facts and indignation over betrayal by those who we have trusted. Nothing short of a tsunami of public indignation will spare mankind from forced vaccines. If you want to help us in this undertaking, click here.] -GEG

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

GEG Commentary

Northern Italy: Dozens Wounded in Clash with Police Over Covid-19 Lockdowns

October 30, 2020 CNN 0

Ten foreigners were detained by police in Milan, suggesting that they were not freedom protestors at all but may have been hired thugs — as we have seen in all ‘social-justice’ riots involving violence and destruction — whose assignment is to create destruction to justify martial law, which is the end game.

Health

Proof That Oregon Health Department is Run by Clowns

October 30, 2020 UK Independent 0

Now we know for sure what we suspected all along! Note she uses the word ‘cases’ not ‘infections’. Cases can be anything including someone with a cough or even someone who was close to someone who had a cough. In other words, “case” statistics are 100% bogus.

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ethan
Ethan
5 months ago

Jacobsen was forced to pay a five dollar fine, not get vaccinated. Read the case. That case is also from 1905, before courts applied the Bill of Rights to state law as they now due after the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Don’t give up on the constitutional argument as a lot has changed since 1905.

Cal
Cal
5 months ago

You are incorrect in your premise that the courts, or any other branch of delegated powers, are the last word of what are those powers delegated. James Madison, Report of 1800, is why we have STATE (not court) nullification: when the three branches of the federal government betray us the states have the final say: “The resolution [the famous Virginia Resolutions of 1798] supposes that dangerous powers, not delegated, may not only be usurped and executed by the other departments, BUT THAT THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT ALSO MAY EXERCISE OR SANCTION DANGEROUS POWERS BEYOND THE GRANT OF THE CONSTITUTION; and, consequently,… Read more »

Gourdhead
Gourdhead
5 months ago

Well then, see if you can find me.

Damiel
Damiel
5 months ago

By the time there is a proven safe vaccine for this virus there will be no need to vaccinate anyone, forcibly or otherwise.
We reserve the right to be secure in our persons, homes papers and effects. That is the fourth amendment and it supercedes any judge or previously judged case.

Courtney Huber
Courtney Huber
5 months ago

Since the vaccine was not first tested on animals and was rushed to market, the vaccine could definitely be considered experimental. The Nuremberg Code prevents forced experimentation.

Myself
Myself
4 months ago
Reply to  Courtney Huber

It’s never been observed. Long time herbdk remedies have more time under observational science than the virus or the vaccine. Besides. Astaxanthin is only one product proven to protect the cell from any toxicity known to man. As allege can live in space for 9 days and when eaten doubles as a natural sunscreen protecting each cell from Uzv rays. Corporate science is just bad. Really. Nature always tops the garbage simulations produced by low class Desperado’s needing to pay for their new pool or next vacation. CBC YouTube Secrets of Sugar Doc. Makes it all clear on who is… Read more »

sojournerholmes
sojournerholmes
5 months ago

Over my cold dead flesh . By the Kingdom of Heaven which is in me and everyone else who calls upon Jesus Christ , i choose the SPIRIT over weak flesh which cannot save from death . Great incorruptible SPIRIT please help us all and give us thy Heavenly Light, Grace, mercy in these trying times

Branco
Branco
5 months ago

Do you know, if this case has been overturned? By another case?

Eileen Kuch
Eileen Kuch
5 months ago

The US Supreme Court has made a huge mistake in ruling that forced vaccinations are constitutional. Apparently, they failed to look up and read the Constitution when it comes to forcing unlawful actions against the American people. Forced vaccinations are unlawful. Why? First of all ALL vaccines have toxins in them that can cause serious harm, and even death.
How on Earth can the Supreme Court make this terrible mistake, when it comes to forced vaccinations that could seriously harm – or even kill – people, including infants and children? This is murder, period.

Graham F Pick
Graham F Pick
5 months ago

Wrong! The state sought to punish Jacobson for not receiving a vaccination. “THE CASE DID NOT IMPOSE A VACCINE MANDATE; people who declined the vaccine were forced to pay a $5 criminal penalty. (This model, more or less, is how Chief Justice Roberts rewrote the ACA individual mandate: you don’t have to buy an insurance; merely pay a penalty-tax for going uninsured.)”

Mike
Mike
4 months ago

The forced vax question that should be completely negated by substantial prophylactic options, like either the orthomlecular cocktails (megavitamin C and D, magnesium, zinc, flavonoids) or HCQ + zinc.

Eowyn
Eowyn
4 months ago

Did you know that Jacobson and his son had been vaccinated for smallpox before and were vaccine injured. The had been vaccinated before the arbitrary date set by the state and were being told that they had to be revaccinated. Instead, they paid the fine and were never revaccinated.

True
True
4 months ago

Yet, the vaccination must be 100% safe and effective. One cannot be forced to take a question mark. And the health provider/doctor must be held 100% responsible for any ill effects.
 

Last edited 4 months ago by True
Tina Golaszewski
Tina Golaszewski
4 months ago
Reply to  True

Only around 50% of Americans get a seasonal flu shot and you are going to force all, good like.

Dottie
Dottie
4 months ago

Who might have a better understanding of what was said and what it meant – someone looking back to 115 years ago? OR someone ALIVE at the time the decision was written and made public record? This quote is from a book titled “Compulsory Vaccination: The Crime Against the School Child” which was first published in 1915:   “The Supreme Court of Massachusetts in the case of Jacobson in 1903 decided that it was not in the power of the law to compel vaccination of any one who objected to it, but only to collect the fine of five dollars.… Read more »

MaryAnn
MaryAnn
4 months ago

The U.S. Constitution is one of NEGATIVE instructions. Neither the president, congress, or court are allowed to touch the people who are not U.S. citizens (different than the state citizens and non-citizens). Obama’s SCOTUS unlawfully approved the Affordable Care Act, an unConstitutional statute. Fed and state are only to PROTECT our rights not infringe on them.

Dana
Dana
4 months ago

What about people who are allergic to all kinds of medications, and the fillers you put in those shots. I’m one of them that a shot could kill me. So then my life is worth nothing.

Crazyy mmann
Crazyy mmann
2 months ago

peopel have been so dumbded down , the fact that the majority still believe that the so-called virus is something that can harm them is why we are in this predicament . the public education system has failed us all !! time to wise up we need them not , TERRAIN THEORY is by far superior to GERM theory !!! wake up and start learning !

trackback
The Destructive Coronavirus Agenda – News With Views
6 days ago

[…] this. According to G. Edward Griffin, in Need to Know, attorney Alan Dershowitz says we have no constitutional protection against being forcibly vaccinated because no one has a right to spread a deadly disease.  The Court contends that the state has an […]