Senator Josh Hawley Proposes Legislation to Bring Transparency and Accountability to Big Tech for Political Censorship

Josh Hawley, Wiki
Freshman Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) authored a bill to end immunity granted to tech companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act that shields them from publisher liability lawsuits if the companies provide an open public forum. However, the tech giants have engaged in political censorship. Under the legislation, the big tech companies could earn their immunity if external audits prove that their algorithms and content-removal policies remain politically neutral.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) proposed legislation Wednesday to end big tech companies’ legislative immunity, which would prevent them from censoring conservative and alternative viewpoints without significant recourse.

Sen. Hawley proposed the Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act, which updates the way the federal government treats social media companies under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA).

The Missouri conservatives’ legislation removes the big tech’s immunity received under Section 230 unless they submit to an external audit that would prove that their algorithms and content-removal policies remain politically neutral. Sen. Hawley’s legislation would only apply to large tech companies such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter, not small and medium-sized tech companies.

“With Section 230, tech companies get a sweetheart deal that no other industry enjoys: complete exemption from traditional publisher liability in exchange for providing a forum free of political censorship,” said Sen. Hawley in a statement Wednesday. “Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly, big tech has failed to hold up its end of the bargain.”

Hawley’s legislation arises as the Donald Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) will reportedly begin antitrust investigations into America’s largest technology companies.

Other conservatives, such as Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), have proposed eliminating or amending Section 230 to curb big tech companies’ ability to censor conservative and alternative viewpoints.

Sen. Hawley’s legislation would:

  • Remove automatic immunity under Section 230 from big tech companies.
  • Give big tech companies the ability to earn their immunity through external audits.
    • However, the Federal Trade Commission could not certify large social media companies from immunity except for a supermajority vote by the agency.
    • Big tech companies would have to pay for the cost of conducting the audits.
    • The companies would have to reapply for immunity every two years.
  • Preserves immunity for small and medium-sized companies.
    • The bill would not apply to companies with less than 30 million active monthly users, more than 300 million active monthly users worldwide, or those companies that have more than $500 million in global annual revenue.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


Gates Vaccine Spreads Polio Across Africa

October 15, 2020 F. William Engdahl 7

The UN recently admitted that new cases of polio have resulted in Africa from an oral polio vaccine developed with support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Gates pushes polio vaccines in Africa when many more lives could be saved with investments in clean water and proper sanitation.


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Notify of
1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Karl McGaugh
Karl McGaugh
1 year ago

How about jail time for censors, liars, and frauds? All media platforms that are free and open to the public should be considered free speech zones. If we want to censor porn for example then a national law must be passed in Congress. The same method for certain kinds of free speech that promotes violent criminal actions like terrorism, riots, & pedophilia.