Double Standard, Indeed! Washington Post Ignored Sexual-Assault Claim Against Virginia’s LT Governor Justin Fairfax But Skewered Judge Kavanaugh


The Washington Post was aware for more than a year of Vanessa Tyson’s claim of sexual assault against Virginia’s Lt. Governor Justin Fairfax, a Democrat who is next in line to become Governor if Ralph Northam steps down. The paper, however, declined to publish the story, claiming it could not be corroborated. It is impossible not to draw a comparisons to the media’s savage treatment of Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, during his confirmation hearings. The Washington Post trumpeted almost every accusation against him, in total disregard of the the lack of proof. -GEG

  • Virginia Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax denied an uncorroborated sexual assault allegation on Monday.
  • The Washington Post was aware of the allegation last year but declined to publish for lack of corroborating evidence.
  • The Fairfax accusation has drawn comparisons to the media’s handling of claims against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The
uncorroborated sexual assault allegation against Virginia Lt. Gov.
Justin Fairfax, a Democrat, has drawn comparisons to the uncorroborated
allegations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Fairfax issued a statement early Monday morning disputing a report
by the right-wing blog Big League Politics, which linked Fairfax to an
accusation of sexual assault at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.
Fairfax said at a press conference Monday that he had a consensual
encounter with the woman, but denied that he sexually assaulted her.

Fairfax is poised to succeed embattled Gov. Ralph Northam if the Virginia Democrat resigns over a racist photo on his yearbook page that showed a man wearing blackface and another wearing a Klu Klux Klan robe. Northam first admitted to being one of the people in the photo, before backtracking and saying he wore blackface on a different occasion, but not in the photo.

The Washington Post reported
on Monday that it had been aware of the allegation against Fairfax for
over a year, but was unable to corroborate it. Fairfax “incorrectly”
claimed the Post declined to publish the claim because it found “red
flags” regarding the woman’s story, according to the paper.

“Fairfax
and the woman told different versions of what happened in the hotel
room with no one else present. The Washington Post could not find anyone
who could corroborate either version,” the Post reported.

The Post’s original decision not to publish the Fairfax accusation drew comparisons to the Post’s coverage of the Kavanaugh accusations, which also lacked corroborating evidence. The paper did not return The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment. (RELATED: Nine Times Media Pushed Misinformation About Kavanaugh)

“It’s good to see that the newspaper has found a renewed interest in
the standard of proof it abandoned entirely when it broke the story of
similar allegations of sexual misconduct leveled last year against
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Recall that it was the Post that
first got Christine Blasey Ford to go on the record with her
allegations,” wrote the Washington Examiner’s Becket Adams.

“It’s
fine if the Post passed on the Fairfax story because of a genuine lack
of evidence. And there definitely doesn’t appear to be that much to go
on, other than the word of a single accuser,” Adams added. “But it’s
hard to see the Post’s decision to spike her story as anything but
politically biased considering how the paper gorged itself on nearly
every flimsy and fantastic allegation hurled in Kavanaugh’s direction,
no matter how ridiculous, again with no evidence to back any of it up.”

Read full article here…