Los Angeles Area Teacher Exposes the Front Lines of Teaching in an Immigrant Enclave


An ‘English as a second language’ teacher in Southern California explains the true cost of illegal immigration and shows that so-called cheap labor may be cheap for the employer but expensive for taxpayers. Benefits to illegal aliens include subsidized housing, food stamps, free insurance, free education for children plus free breakfasts and lunches, subsidized energy bills, Social Security benefits, free child care and more. Meanwhile, taxpayers are stuck with higher insurance rates, higher medical costs, increasing crime, lower standards of education in schools, and overcrowding.

0
SHARES

TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint

Via Jim Quinn’s Burning Platform blog,Sent by P2

Shared on Facebook by a teacher in California who sees firsthand the destruction of America.

“Nine hundred teachers just got laid off from the Los Angeles Unified
School District. They are $650,000 over their annual budget. The
following comments by an English teacher help to explain one area that
looms large over California’s educational crisis. I hope each person
receiving this mail will read it carefully, all the way to the end.

It is sad what is happening to our great country, all because
our politicians are afraid they will miss out on a vote. What a
travesty!

This English teacher has phrased it the best I’ve seen yet and it
should make everyone think, be you Democrat, Republican or Independent.

From a California school teacher…

As you listen to the news about the student protests over illegal
immigration, there are some things that you should be aware of: I
am in charge of the English-as-a-second-language department at a large
southern California high school which is designated a Title-1 school,
meaning that its students average in the lower socio-economic and income
levels.

Most of the schools you are hearing about are Compton, South Gate
High, Bell Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where their students are
protesting – these are also Title-1 schools.

Title-1 schools are on the free-breakfast and free-lunch program.
When I say free breakfast, I’m not talking about a glass of milk and a
roll. But a full breakfast and cereal bar with fruits and juices that
would make the Marriott proud.

The waste of this food is monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (Our tax dollars at work!)

I estimate that well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight. About 75% or more have cell phones.

The school also provides day care centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls
(some as young as 13) so they can attend class without the
inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or having family
watch their kids (More of our tax dollars at work!)

I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my department, or risk losing
funding for the upcoming year even though there was little need for
anything.

My budget was already substantial, but I ended up buying new
computers for the Computer Learning Center, half of which, one month
later, were carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who
obviously feel humbled and grateful to have a free education in America
. (More and more of our tax dollars at work!)

Read full article here…




Rockefeller, Johns Hopkins, and Bristol Meyers Sqibb Sued for $1-Billion for Intentionally Infecting People with Syphilis


A federal judge approved a $1-billion lawsuit against Johns Hopkins University, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and the Rockefeller Foundation for intentionally infecting victims with syphilis during government experiments in Guatemala during the 1940s. The test subjects in the experiments were mainly children, orphans, patients from mental hospitals, and inmates, and most were never treated. The horrific studies remained a secret until 2010 when Dr. Susan Reverby of Wellesley College uncovered details of the experiment. -GEG

A federal judge recently approved a $1 billion lawsuit against Johns
Hopkins University, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co (BMY.N) and the Rockefeller
Foundation. The lawsuit is seeking restitution for victims who were
intentionally infected with syphilis during government experiments in
Guatemala during the 1940s.

Hundreds of Guatemalans were reportedly infected with syphilis during
the studies, which were designed to test the ability of penicillin to
treat sexually transmitted diseases. The lawsuit was pending and waiting
in limbo for the past four years until it was finally approved by U.S.
District Judge Theodore Chuang last month. In 2015, when the lawsuit was
originally filed, there were 750 victims seeking restitution, now there
are only 444 plaintiffs and some remaining relatives.

The test subjects in the experiments were mainly children, orphans, patients from mental hospitals and inmates.

The horrific studies remained a secret until 2010 when Dr. Susan
Reverby of Wellesley College in Massachusetts uncovered details of the
experiment, forcing a formal apology from then President Barack Obama.

Reverby learned of the experiments after the death of John Charles
Cutler, one of the lead researchers in the study. Cutler left behind a
stack of files which contained details of the barbaric experiments.

Read full article here…




#REDforED: Socialists Organizing Teachers to Turn Purple States Blue


The left has a new movement, #REDforED, that aims to convert purple states to blue, solidify blue states, and put red states in play, using the education system as its power base. The highly organized movement has targeted the electoral college for the 2020 presidential election in states where Trump’s margins of victory were narrow. Recently, teachers in Los Angeles and Denver went on strike, embracing the #REDforED platform, which seeks more pay for teachers, no accountability for education results, and removal of financial support for charter schools that compete with government schools. -GEG

A well-funded and subversive leftist movement of teachers in the
United States threatens to tilt the political balance nationwide in the
direction of Democrats across the country as Republicans barely hang on
in key states that they need to hold for President Donald Trump to win
re-election and for Republicans to have a shot at retaking the House and
holding onto their Senate majority.

This teachers union effort, called #RedforEd, has its roots in the
very same socialism that President Trump vowed in his 2019 State of the
Union address to stop, and it began in its current form in early 2018 in
a far-flung corner of the country before spreading nationally. Its
stated goals–higher teacher pay and better education conditions–are
overshadowed by a more malevolent political agenda: a leftist Democrat
uprising designed to flip purple or red states to blue, using the might
of a significant part of the education system as its lever.

The movement takes its name from a political organizing tool first seen in Florida in 2010, when teachers union members wore red to express political opposition to public school reform proposals under consideration at that time in the state and encouraged parents and political activists from other unions to join them.

Here, for the first time, Breitbart News pulls the mask back from
what #RedforEd really is, who is behind the movement, and what its true
objectives are, in a full examination of exactly who these people
influencing the teachers of America’s kids are and what their
goals–particularly their political objectives–really are.

Teachers unions in the United States have become increasingly
aggressive since early 2018, launching strikes in West Virginia,
Arizona, Oklahoma, Kentucky, Los Angeles, California, and Denver,
Colorado, spurred on by a social media campaign known as #RedforEd,
which was launched in March 2018 by Noah Karvelis, a 24-year-old
left-wing political activist in just his second year as a public school
teacher in Arizona.

Ostensibly focused on better pay for teachers, the real objective of
the #RedforEd movement, as expressed by its young founder at the Socialism 2018  conference held in Chicago this July, is to obtain political power to advance a socialist agenda.

“We’ve created an organization now. We have a network of 2,000
leaders who are experienced. They’ve been out on a job action. They’ve
organized their campuses. They’ve collected signatures for a ballot
initiative,” Karvelis said in his 13 minute speech to an estimated 1,800
fellow socialists from around the country, a number of whom were also
teachers. (Beginning at the 11:00 minute mark of the video of his speech
found at this KFYI webpage.

“We’ve built a new political power in Arizona and it’s taking control right now of the future of the state,” Karvelis added.

“We have to build our own political power. We have to build our own organization. We have to stay true to our values. They have to be Democratic,” the young socialist teacher concluded.

his hyper-partisan political activism among teachers unions across
the country championed by Karvelis in his Socialism 2018 speech has a
specific political purpose in the 2020 presidential and congressional
elections: to help drive battleground states from purple to blue,
solidify blue states, and put red states in play.

In other words, in addition to getting pay raises for teachers, a key
objective of the #Redf0rEd movement — despite its organizers’ public
claims of “non-partisan”ship — is to defeat Donald Trump in 2020 and
elect a Democrat president.

A look at the electoral college map suggests that a highly focused
effort of mobilized #RedforEd activists could have a significant impact
in 2020.

This heightened political activism of teachers unions in the
#RedforEd campaign has the potential to swing the outcome of the 2020
presidential election in several key battleground states — such
as Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Colorado,
where margins of victory were very narrow.

President Trump won Michigan by less than 11,000 votes, Pennsylvania
by less than 45,000 votes, and Wisconsin by less than 23,000 votes.

A hyperactive #RedforEd movement has the potential to swing that many
votes, or more, away from President Trump in all three states.

Similarly, President Trump lost Minnesota by a little more than
44,000 votes. An aggressive #RedforEd campaign there has the potential
of keeping Trump from turning Minnesota red in 2020.

Though Hillary Clinton’s margin of victory in Colorado was slightly
higher–a little more than 135,000 votes, or 5 percent of the votes cast
in the state–the Trump campaign has that state in its sights for 2020.
#RedforEd political activism in that state could also potentially keep
it in the Democrat column on election day.

A movement that can turn out 50,000 to 75,000 protesters
at the Arizona Capitol has the potential to bring President Trump’s 3.5
point margin of victory in the state (less than 91,000 votes) to
something much closer in 2020, especially in light of Democrat Sen.
Kyrsten Sinema’s (D-AZ) November 2018 statewide victory over Republican Martha McSally (now serving in the U.S. Senate by appointment after her electoral loss).

Without the 57 electoral college votes from Michigan (16),
Pennsylvania (20), Wisconsin (10), and Arizona (11), President Trump’s
electoral college total on election night would have dropped from 306 —
36 more than the 270 needed to win the presidency — to 249, or 21 short
of the 270 needed to win the presidency.

The stated initial purpose of the #RedforEd campaign was to obtain national support for Arizona public school teachers who went on strike in April for a 20 percent pay raise. The strike was settled in May when most of their demands were met.

A key tactic in the Arizona #RedforEd campaign was the mobilization
of red-clad teachers and supporters in a Phoenix march last April,
described as the largest teachers march in the state’s history.

The national #RedforEd campaign was only beginning, however.
Subsequently, teachers in Los Angeles, California, and Denver, Colorado,
went on strike, all embracing the #RedforEd platform, which seeks more
pay for teachers, no accountability for public education results, and
the end to public financial support for alternatives to our failing
public education system.

The Los Angeles teachers strike ended in January. The Denver teachers strike ended last week.

In an article titled “Teachers are leading a national workers revolt. Oakland may be next,” Vox reported
on Monday that, “Public school teachers in Oakland, California, said
they will strike on Thursday, following 18 months of tense negotiations
with district officials over pay raises and classroom sizes.”

On Tuesday, teachers in West Virginia went on strike for the second
time in two years, this time for clearly political purposes, as NPR reported:

West Virginia public school teachers are striking over a
new bill that paves the way for charter schools and private school
vouchers in a state that relies primarily on public education.

In anticipation of the strike, almost all of the state’s 55 public school systems have canceled classes for Tuesday.

As the Cato Institute reported,
spending on public schools more than doubled between 1970 and 2010 (in
constant 2013 dollars) and public school employment nearly doubled,
while public elementary and secondary school student performance — as
measured by standardized tests of math, science, and reading — has
remained stagnant. The most recent Nation’s Report Card indicates that
the trend of stagnant student performance in math and reading continued between 2009 and 2017, while civic literacy, deemed below proficient, did not improve between 2010 and 2014.

The #RedforEd campaign is just the latest version of teachers union activism, a twist on the “Wear Red for Public Ed” campaign
that was started in a Facebook page (that still exists) by Florida
schoolteacher Donna Yates Mace in late 2010 to signify opposition to
newly elected Gov. Rick Scott’s proposed education reforms. Scott, a
Republican, was subsequently elected to the U.S. Senate in November
2018.

Mace — aided by the Florida Education Association and a Facebook site
(no longer operational) started by Chris Janotta, a public school
teacher in Illinois, called “The Million Teacher March” — launched a
“National Wear Red for Public Ed Day” on January 4, 2011, to protest the
inauguration of Gov. Scott in Florida, as the South Florida Sun Sentinel reported:

In a quiet show of opposition to changes proposed by Gov.
Rick Scott’s education transition team, some parents and teachers
across Florida wore red and lit up Facebook with messages of support for
public schools. As part of a grassroots campaign, they posted pictures
of themselves and their children in red, with some changing their
profile photos to incorporate red and others putting up images of a
single red T-shirt.

Scott’s team late last month recommended the state revisit merit pay
for teachers, expand school voucher programs and alter how public
schools are funded. Most of the ideas mirrored the new governor’s
campaign promise to get rid of an “outdated” educational system and give
parents more choices for their children.

To signal their disapproval, several popular Facebook groups,
including Stop Senate Bill 6 and Testing Is Not Teaching, embraced the
move to “Wear Red to Support Public Ed.” The idea came from a
Jacksonville teacher, Donna Yates Mace, and quickly spread over the
Internet.

Read full article here…