As California Goes, So Goes the Nation – Agenda 21 and the 5G Weapons System

Gavin Newsom is expected to become the next Governor of California, which is the most populous state in the US with almost 40 million people that often sets trends for the rest of the country.  Newsom is a globalist who plans to follow the United Nations’ Agenda 21 scheme that will plunge California deeper into tyranny with policies that include: getting rid of cars, expansion of mass transit trains and buses, and housing built near transit rails.  Newsom’s futuristic plans are dependent upon the 5G weapons system that is being prepared for rollout.  Both Newsom, a Democrat, and his opponent, John Cox, who is a Republican, support UN Agenda 21.  Gary Gileno, the producer and narrator of this video report, will be one of the presenters at the upcoming Red Pill Expo, in Spokane, Washington, June 201-23. Learn about it here.

Recent California Election Results:

 

 




13-Year Old Black Boy Lied about White Supremacists Robbing and Beating Him

Houston: 13-year-old Zavion Parker claimed he was grabbed by an adult and four young men after stepping off his school bus. He said that they robbed and beat him, and threatened him with a gun because he was black. The incident was featured in the local media. Now it has been determined that the story was a hoax. The people who live on the property where Zavion says the incident occurred have been harassed and threatened by the black community. -GEG

No one could have predicted this.

From ABC 13:

HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) — Houston police say there is no evidence to support the claims made by a teenager that white supremacists abducted him, injured him and threatened him.

We first brought you this story last month when 13-year-old Zavion Parker claimed he was grabbed by an adult and four young men after stepping off his school bus.

Zavion alleges he was robbed and beaten, all because of his race. He also said he was held at a property at gunpoint until he was able to escape.

Michelle Lee, the teen’s mother, told Eyewitness News her son managed to escape the gun-wielding kidnappers.

“The reason why they got him was because they said he was black. ‘You deserve to die.’ Exactly his words,” Lee told ABC13 in May. “Saying the dad had, like, a white muscle shirt on, and you could see it, was right here big as day. ‘I hate black people.'”

But after a thorough investigation, the Houston Police Department now says the events as described did not occur, that the property Parker described had nothing to do with any crime.

[…]HPD says they will not be filing charges against anyone involved in what was essentially a false report.

Read full article here…




UN Plans to Deal with African Population Explosion by Forcing Mass Migration on the West

UN Secretary General António Guterres says that UN member states should prepare for increased migration, which means that Europe and the entire Western World must prepare for migration from Africa.  Currently, nearly 1.3 billion people live in Africa, and by the end of this century there will be 4.4 billion.  By that time, the number of indigenous Europeans will be fewer than a quarter of a billion. UN planners say that Africa cannot cope with such a sharp increase, so inhabitants must be moved to developed countries. The elimination of nation-states is a necessary step.  The UN’s report, Making Migration Work for All , tries to convince readers that immigration is positive. However, 73% of Europeans who were polled believe that financial support for migrants will be a serious burden on state budgets. -GEG

UN member states should prepare for great migratory movements, said UN Secretary General António Guterres on 11th of January 2018 during the presentation of the report on the management of migration processes. And this is not a joke: The UN, led by António Guterres, wants to manage and influence migration. All this, of course, is dressed up in pretty words about the need to provide humanitarian aid, and also justified by the benefits that resettlement of the population is to give to the economies of particular countries. However, in fact, this means only one thing: Europe and the entire Western World must prepare for the flood of Africans.

Currently, nearly 1,3 billion people live in Africa, and by the end of this century there will be 350% more, or 4,4 billion.1) It is obvious that the continent, whose inhabitants are not able to feed themselves, let alone achieve an adequate level of urbanization and industrialization, cannot cope with such a sharp demographic increase. The UN therefore came up with the idea of resettling Africans to Europe and highly developed countries on other continents.

At the end of 2016, just after his election as UN Secretary General, António Guterres said: “We must convince Europeans that migration is inevitable and that multiethnic and multireligious societies create wealth”.2) It can be assumed here that the goal set by the former UN commissioner for refugees (A. Gutters served this function from June to December 2015), is to promote migration, give it a legal framework and manage it globally.

The first major step towards formalization of this phenomenon was the creation of the “Making Migration Work for All” report, which says in no uncertain terms that nation-states are to cease to exist. The document says that migration would be beneficial to everyone. And it is beneficial… to migrants alone (who apart from being accommodated in apartments live on undeserved entitlements) rather than to the average European who has to work to make a living for himself and his family, pay for his home and, additionally, provide for millions more newcomers.

The position expressed by Gutters during the presentation of this report makes our hair stand on end.3) The analysis of the speech of the UN secretary implies a simple conclusion: migration will still be bigger, we (UN) will manage it, and you (Western countries and societies) have to adapt:

„The fundamental challenge is to maximize the benefits of this orderly, productive form of migration while stamping out the abuses and prejudice that make life hell for a minority of migrants.”

and:

„States need to strengthen the rule of law underpinning how they manage and protect migrants — for the benefit of their economies, their societies and migrants themselves.”

The propaganda statement that migration brings social and economic benefits has become so deeply rooted in the media and political rhetoric that some people have begun to believe in it. It is a pity that theses statements are not supported by any calculations or analyses.

„Migration is a positive global phenomenon. It powers economic growth, reduces inequalities, connects diverse societies and helps us ride the demographic waves of population growth and decline.”

According to a research4) conducted by the Hungarian Századvég foundation, mass migration is perceived by the citizens of all 28 European Union countries as a threat to the EU economy, the heritage of the member states and the presence of Third World aliens is believed to undermine security. The vast majority, as many as 68%, are afraid of the inflow of migrants from North Africa. For 70% of the inhabitants of the Old Continent, the growing number of Muslims is a serious threat, while only 8% say that this issue is not a problem. Citizens of European countries are afraid of increased crime and subsequent terrorist attacks. More than half of the pollees think that immigrants come to Europe mainly for economic reasons, that is, they are attracted by a high level of social benefits. 57% of respondents believe that the influx of immigrants from Africa and the Middle East will change the culture of their country, and 73% state that financial support for migrants will be a serious burden on state budgets. 61% believe that the influx of people from the Third World will weaken the EU economy.

Negative processes accompanying the resettlement of people were, however, completely ignored by the UN and transferred to countries which are not able to cope with this phenomenon:

„Migration (…), which powers economic growth, reduces inequalities, connects diverse societies (…) remains poorly managed.”

and:

„The best way to end the stigma of illegality and abuse around migrants is, in fact, for Governments to put in place more legal pathways for migration.”

The report completely distorts the nature of threats to Western civilization, and also underestimates the importance of homogeneity, rejecting entirely the advantage that national states offer. The United Nations points out that shrinking populations is a danger for Europe, and Antonio Guterres suggests that the demographic collapse can be remedied by resettling the population surplus from Africa. By the end of this century, the number of indigenous Europeans will amount to fewer than a quarter of a billion, whereas there will be almost 4.4 billion Africans. The host society, according to the UN Secretary General, has no right to think that migrations are a negative phenomenon:

„It can be seen, too, in the political impact of public perception that wrongly sees migration as out of control. The consequences include increased mistrust and policies aimed more at stopping than facilitating human movement.”

Also, the International Migration Organization, which participated in the work on this report, states on its Twitter account that „Migration is inevitable, desirable and necessary”.5) The question arises: who wants migration and who thinks it is necessary? Certainly not the inhabitants of the countries to which the alleged refugees are streaming.

The report states that:

  • migration is inevitable, therefore it must be properly organized and the UN provides guidance on how to manage it;
  • nation states must adapt to the admission of migrants in accordance with the guidelines;
  • the societies of developed countries must become accustomed to having their countries flooded with masses of migrants.

Read full article here…




President Trump Commutes Prison Sentence of Go-Between for Drug Dealers

At the request of Kim Kardashian, President Trump commuted the life sentence of Alice Johnson who was convicted 21 years ago of brokering the deals of a multi-million-dollar drug ring that trafficked thousands of pounds of cocaine. The motive behind this presidential pardon likely has little to do with Johnson and much to do with promoting pending legislation supported by George Soros and Black Lives Matter. If passed by Congress, the new law would make it more difficult to imprison criminals and would cause thousands of convicted criminals to be released. -GEG

President Trump announced that he will be commuting the sentence of drug trafficker, Alice Johnson, shortly after he had a meeting with Kim Kardashian.
Alice Johnson, 63, is a grandmother who writes plays. At least, that’s the friendly way she is described in the media. Recently, she was the subject of a video that portrayed her in a sympathetic light as a non-violent drug offender who spent 21 years in prison for a victimless crime. Sounds rather unfair, doesn’t it?
However, she received a life sentence for her role as a leader of a multi-million-dollar cocaine ring  that trafficked 4,400 to 6,600 pounds into the US from Colombia.  She acted as a broker for drug traffickers in Memphis in the early 1990s but says she never actually sold drugs to users – as though that makes a difference. The judge who sentenced her called her the ‘quintessential entrepreneur’ of the drug ring and said that the impact of 4,400 to 6,600 pounds of cocaine in the community was profound. It will never be known how many human lives were lost because of her leadership role in this activity.
Johnson’s case is not merely about drug possession or dealing, and neither is her pardon. It is likely that her pardon was motivated primarily to affect public opinion. Kardashian had been meeting with Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and their clearly stated goal is to bring about the same changes in the criminal-justice system that are supported by George Soros and Black Lives Matter. In other words, this is about much more than Alice Johnson.
Those changes, currently described in the media as ‘prison-reform’, include releasing criminals back onto the streets without requiring bail pending trial. Without cash collateral, the worst criminals will skip out on court appearances. Soros has no problem with this and is funding election campaigns of local district attorneys and judges who agree. [A major portion of Soros funding everywhere in the world is used to support movements that lead to violence, a breakdown of civil order, and public acceptance of martial law as the necessary solution. Releasing criminal elements from prison is merely another example of this pattern. It’s disturbing to see President Trump falling in line with that program.]
Sources:
https://needtoknow.news/2018/05/criminal-justice-reform-strange-bedfellows/
https://www.dailywire.com/news/31538/trump-commutes-drug-dealers-life-sentence-because-ben-shapiro
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5787699/Alice-Johnsons-daughter-calls-Kim-Kardashian-Godsend.html