UK Proposes 6-Months in Prison for Sharing Racist or Anti-Gay Posts on Social Media

Social media users who post or share racist or anti-gay comments will face jail under newly proposed rules. Judges are being advised to order harsh punishments for those found guilty of stirring up ‘hatred’ against racial, religious, or sexual minority groups. Hatred in these cases is a euphemism for criticizing someone or hurting their feelings. -GEG
  • Critics say the proposals mean heedless insults could result in prison sentences
  • Someone who creates hate speech that threatens life should expect three years
  • Aggravating factors include activity ‘in a particularly sensitive social climate’ 

Social media users who share or comment on racist or anti-gay postings will face jail under rules proposed yesterday.

Advice for judges and magistrates recommends harsh punishments for those found guilty of stirring up hatred against racial, religious or sexual minority groups.

Among those jailed should be people who post comments or share online hate speech because they have been reckless as to whether they stir up hatred, say the proposals from the Sentencing Council

Social media users in the UK who share or comment on racist or anti-gay postings will face jail under rules proposed yesterday

Those found guilty of hate trolling by commenting or sharing social media should typically receive a sentence of six months in jail.

Anyone who is convicted of orginating hate speech that threatens anyone’s life or which is widely distributed should expect three years.

Even someone whose words or material were judged as hateful, but were not considered to have threatened life or reached a big audience, is likely to be punished with a year in jail.

But critics say the proposals will mean young people who heedlessly throw insults against racial, religious or sexual groups on the internet are at risk of prison sentences.

The recommendations, which will be subject to a three-month consultation, come at a time of deepening sensitivity to racism and abuse about sexuality online.

On top of long-standing concerns about material posted by extremists, accusations have been levelled against those in mainstream politics and other well-known individuals.

Read full article here…

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary


EU to Create Transatlantic Facial-Recognition Database with Link to US

February 24, 2020 RT 0

National police forces of 10 EU member states are calling to create a system of interlinked facial recognition databases in addition to Prüm, the EU-wide database-cross-referencing system that already allows for all-at-once scanning of individual DNA, fingerprint, and vehicle registration databases.


For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
DobKevin Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

A good indicator of whether a behaviour is correct, moral, etc., is to ask, “What would be the result if everyone did it?” This one’s a no-brainer.


This is not about “sensitivity to racism and abuse”. It is about Neo-Bolsheviks gaining power. One of the first major acts of Communist rule in Soviet Russia after the October Revolution of 1917 was when Lenin convinced the Central Committee to take harsh measures against the press and free speech. The same thing is happening here, and for the same reason. These restrictions are the first steps of much worse things to come.