Kids Introduced to Illuminati Theory by the Cartoon Network

Paul Romano comments on the Cartoon Network’s show, Teen Titans Go, which, in this episode, is preparing young children to recognize Illuminati symbolism and theory for world domination by banks and elitists. It’s not clear why they are doing this, especially inasmuch as the cartoon creates both positive and negative impressions about the Illuminati ‘Master’ and Robin, the ‘good guy’ leader of the group seeking understanding. It’s possible the producers really don’t understand the deeper meaning of this symbolism and are just using bits and dabs of it they have come across to cobble together an interesting story for the kiddies, but it also is possible that they are hoping to prepare young minds to subliminally recognize these symbols and theories and to ‘normalize’ them in their thinking later on. Either way, we are including this in our news because we think you may be interested in what is being shown to our children on the cartoon channel. -GEG 




Democrats: White Christian Women Need Not Apply

The Democratic Party has published a list of desired categories for women in office. The list does not include white or Christian.  Here is the order of their preferences: Black women, LGBT women, Muslim women, Disabled women, Jewish women, Latina women, Millennial women, Jewish women (listed twice), AAPI (Asian) women, and More women. The Party says the reason white and Christian are not listed is that these already are well represented. Multi-culturalism is the goal. [Oh, yes. Don’t forget that, statistically, these categories predominantly vote Democrat.] -GEG


The Democratic Party wants women to be elected to office — unless they’re white and Christian.

Read full article here…




UK: Parliament Computers Used 160 Times Per Day to Access Blocked Pornography Sites

Between June and October, 2017, there were 24,000 attempts to access pornography on the House of Parliament’s computer network, which is used by MPs, Peers, and staff.  This averages to 160 attempts each day. A separate FOI request shows there were almost 3-million attempts to access blocked websites from January to October 2017.  Blocked websites could include pornography, dating services, games, and entertainment.  Officials say that most of these access attempts are not intentional but, rather, the result of malware that responds to keyword searches for other types of information. -GEG

More than 24,000 attempts were made to access pornographic websites in the Houses of Parliament since the general election, according to official data.

The figure of 24,473 attempts represents about 160 requests per day on average from computers and other devices connected to the parliamentary network – which is used by MPs, peers and staff – between June and October last year.

It comes amid a sex scandal in Westminster, during which Theresa May sacked her de facto deputy, Damian Green, after he made “misleading” statements about allegations that police found pornography on computers in his parliamentary office in 2008.

In his resignation letter, Green continued to deny “unfounded and deeply hurtful” claims that he downloaded or viewed the material.

The data, released after a freedom of information (FoI) request by the Press Association, shows a spike in September in the number of attempts to visit the sites, with 9,467 requests from both the Houses of Lords and Commons that month.

Parliamentary authorities say the majority of attempts are not deliberate.

The figures also show a sharp decrease in the number of attempts to access pornographic websites in recent years. In 2016, the parliamentary filtering system blocked 113,208 attempts, down from 213,020 the previous year.

Read full article here…




Germany to Abandon Climate Goal – After Merkel Criticized Trump for Doing Same

Germany will abandon its 2020 national global-warming goal of cutting carbon dioxide emissions 40% below 1990 levels.  This is part of a deal to form a new coalition government.  It’s a major embarrassment to Chancellor Angela Merkel who criticized Trump for withdrawing from the Paris Treaty.  University of Colorado professor, Roger Pielke, says that Germany’s climate goals were mathematically impossible. -GEG

Germany will abandon its 2020 national global warming goal, a huge embarrassment to Chancellor Angela Merkel, as part of a deal to put together a coalition government in the wake of September’s elections.

Sources tell Reuters that Merkel’s would-be coalition will drop a goal of cutting carbon dioxide emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020. Ahead of the elections, Merkel said she’d find a way to meet the 2020 target. That was before she failed to put together a majority governing coalition.

Merkel has been highly critical of President Donald Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris climate accords, even promising to confront the U.S. president on the issue at the 2017 G20 summit in Hamburg.

“We cannot expect easy discussions on climate change at the G20 summit,” Merkel said in June. “Our differences with the U.S. are clear.”

 But now, Merkel’s new government is abandoning its previous climate pledge. Instead, the coalition pushed back its 2020 goal until some time in the 2020s and keeps the goal of reducing emissions 55 percent by 2030.

Reuters reported that would-be coalition members agreed to cut severe taxes and fees on electricity bills to green energy deployment. Germany now has one of the most expensive electricity markets in the world, largely due to taxes.

Though, coalition members still agree to set up a commission to decide when to phase out Germany’s use of coal-fired electricity. Coal currently powers about 40 percent of Germany’s electric needs.

It’s not surprising Germany has decided to abandon its 2020 climate goal. Germany was not on track to meet its climate goal, despite spending nearly $800 billion in green energy subsidies in recent decades.

Read full article here…




Bundy Case Dismissed, Judge Orders Rancher and Sons Released

US District Judge, Gloria Navarro, ruled that the case against Nevada rancher, Cliven Bundy, his two sons, and a supporter, will be dismissed ‘with prejudice,’ which means Bundy cannot be tried again on the same charges. Navarro also ordered that the rancher be set free. The basis for the dismissal of this case is that federal prosecutors hid evidence during the 2017 trial that would have shown he was innocent of the charges brought against him.  In trial, prosecutors ridiculed Bundy’s claim that government snipers were in position during the confrontation. and they hid a video of FBI snipers monitoring the Bundy Ranch even prior to the BLM raid.  Prosecutors withheld a federal assessment of the Bundys declaring them to be unlikely to engage in violence, and they hid other federal assessments that revealed the BLM actually was trying to provoke a violent conflict to justify harsh action against the Bundys. -GEG

U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro ruled Monday the case against Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy would be dismissed “with prejudice,” and ordered the rancher set free after federal prosecutors willfully withheld exculpatory evidence during the 2017 trial.

Navarro ruled a mistrial in the Bundy case last month after prosecutors “willful[ly]” withheld exculpatory evidence favorable to the four men on trial: Cliven Bundy, his two sons and one other person. The judge found that prosecutors had violated the defendant’s civil rights and violated federal law by hiding evidence from the court.

After the mistrial, Navarro set a Jan. 8 date to decide whether the case against Bundy would be retried or dismissed “with prejudice,” barring a retrial over the same charges.

Prosecutors requested the court grant another trial against the Bundys, calling their missteps and violations “inadvertent.”

“The Brady violations found by the court are regrettable and benefit no one,” Nevada’s Acting U.S. Attorney Steven Myhre wrote in legal brief, according to The Oregonian. “But because the government neither flagrantly violated nor recklessly disregarded its obligations, the appropriate remedy for such violations is a new trial.”

The Department of Justice, under order from Attorney General Jeff Sessions, is currently investigating the federal prosecutors involved in the 2017 Bundy trial for misconduct.

Prosecutors, led by Myhre, dismissed several claims from Bundy attorneys that evidence was being hid from the court during the trial.

The defense claimed FBI snipers and surveillance were monitoring the Bundy household prior to the 2014 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) raid to remove the rancher’s cattle from federal land after decades of unpaid grazing fees. Cliven Bundy sent out a plea for help based on the snipers’ presence, prompting dozens of armed militiamen to meet at the ranch.

Prosecutors said snipers were not involved, called the claim “fantastical” and the defendants’ request for the evidence, a “fishing expedition.” However, the U.S. Attorney’s Office possessed video evidence the entire time, The Oregonian reports.

Prosecutors also withheld federal assessments that found the Bundy family was not likely to be violent, but only “get in your face.” Other federal assessments of the BLM revealed the agency was targeting the Bundy family, “trying to provoke a conflict.”

Read full article here…