What’s the Connection Between the ​Planned Elimination of the​ Family ​and Transhumanism​?​

YouT​ube commentator, Paul Romano, explains how motherhood has been demeaned in order to break the mother-child bond and eliminate the family in society. The purpose of this is to cause children to bond with the state instead​.  Children are encouraged to become addicted to technology as a necessary precondition for transhumanism​, which is the blending of humans and machines​.  [Don’t scoff. This process already is well underway. Your uncle’s pace-maker is just the tip of the iceberg.] -GEG​

Youtube personality and psychologist Paul Romano analyzes how and why the ruling oligarchy is attempting to wipe out motherhood.  He says motherhood is under attack because it is ​the building block of life, a connection to God, and essential to mammals.  The mother principle has been savagely attacked over the past few generations, and the result is emotionally ​damaged children with no purpose in life.  He blames this dysfunction on the weakening of the motherhood role​ and the family unit.

Romano references Dr. Joseph Shelton Pierce’s discovery that the majority of heart cells are similar to brain cells there is constant communication between the two organs.  He says that the controllers of the world are aware that mother-and-​child bonding in children’s formative years shapes their development for the rest of their lives, and this is why the oligarchy has invested untold billions of dollars to ​demean the motherhood role​ and break apart​ the family.


Romano says that the introduction of baby bottles, play pens
,​ and baby cribs are examples of ways that the controllers have separated mothers from their babies.  The feminist movement was rolled out to destabilize society,​ and Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA to create this globalist structure that pushes a narrative of dissatisfaction.

The purpose of destroying the motherhood role ​is to force children to bond with the social system (the government) and to program them during their formative years​. Among other things, this blocks development of​ the child’s ​connection to the divine.

Romano says that children spend more than 7 hours a day online. Instead of spending time with families or peers, children are in a cyber dimension that is part of a long-standing program to make them more technology oriented and to think like machines.
Ray Kurzweil, the Director of Engineering for Google, who is also a futurist in the transhumanist movement, says that, whether we want it or not,​ we are headed toward the ‘Brave New World’ of merging man with machines.

​Some g​lobalists already ​are pursuing immortality through machines, with the intent of eventually discarding the ​organic physical body.


Kurziweil is involved in the 2045 Initiative that breaks down the transhumanist movement into three​ steps: Avatar A is a robot slave that can be controlled with thoughts, Avatar B is a human mind that is inserted into an android, and Avatar C is human consciousness and personality that can be uploaded into a computer. Kurzwei believes humans will live forever in a cyber world.  2045 Initiative charges a minimum of $3 million to join.

Romano says that these super elitists don’t mind destroying the planet because they plan to live as machines​ that can withstand harsh conditions and do not need to eat.  He says this plan has been in the works for centuries.  However, the technology is only 60% of the way complete, and humanity is needed to pay for and push technology forward to execute the rest of the program.



Forget Fear of Overpopulation. ​ Half the World​’s Population Groups Are Declining

The UN estimates that almost half of the world’s population lives in countries with below replacement fertility rates. The main clusters of low fertility generally ​are found in advanced and industrialized regions. [This article speculates on the causes of this phenomenon but fails to mention that industrialized regions are more likely to have fluoridated their water systems. Fluoride is known, not only to increase cancer rates, but to reduce fertility rates. The big story here, however, is that all the hand-wringing over an overcrowded future planet is scientifically unfounded. If the current trend continues, it is even possible that mankind soon will be worried about population shrinkage and underproduction.] -GEG

According to the most recent UN estimates (United Nations 2017), almost one half of the world’s population lives in countries with below replacement fertility (BRF), i.e. with a total fertility rate (TFR) below 2.1 births per woman. Of these, one quarter have TFRs close to the replacement level, i.e. between 1.8 and 2.1; the other three-quarters have really low fertility, below 1.8 births per woman. Low-fertility countries are generally grouped into clusters. The main clusters are in East Asia, Southern Europe, the German-speaking countries of Western Europe, and all the former socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Table 1). Schermata 2017-12-03 alle 17.00.40

In fact, contemporary fertility around the globe is lower than it has ever been. Since the middle of the 20th century, childbearing has declined by 50 percent: 50 to 60 years ago women in developed and developing countries combined had on average 5 children, but now the world average is about 2.5 children per woman.

Why do so many countries have below replacement fertility?

Early in the 20th century it became obvious that family size was declining in countries experiencing substantial industrial and urban growth. A number of French, British and American social scientists set out to map and explain this change. Perhaps the most comprehensive and profound explorations were conducted by a team of scholars at Princeton University’s Office of Population Research. Frank Notestein, its first director, outlined what had transpired by mid-20th century, including the main causes for the changing family size, in two papers dealing with what is now known as the “demographic transition” (Notestein 1945 and 1953). Much of the following summary applies even today:

The new ideal of the small family arose typically in the urban industrial society. It is impossible to be precise about the various causal factors, but apparently many were important. Urban life stripped the family of many functions in production, consumption, recreation, and education. In factory employment the individual stood on his own accomplishments. The new mobility of young people and the anonymity of city life reduced the pressures toward traditional behaviour exerted by the family and community. In a period of rapidly developing technology new skills were needed, and new opportunities for individual advancement arose. Education and a rational point of view became increasingly important. As a consequence the cost of child-rearing grew and the possibilities for economic contributions by children declined. Falling death rates at once increased the size of the family to be supported and lowered the inducements to have many births. Women, moreover, found new independence from household obligations and new economic roles less compatible with child-rearing (Notestein 1953:17).

Since then, fertility trends and levels, and their causes and consequences have been the most researched topics in population studies. However, despite the hundreds of published studies, it appears that Notestein’s observation continues to be valid: “it is impossible to be precise about the various causal factors, but apparently many were important”.

Read full article here…




UN Troops May Be Deployed on the Streets of Chicago to Stop Mass Gun Violence

n-v

Illinois: ​Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin is in talks with UN officials to explore the possibility of putting UN troops on the streets of Chicago to address the city’s gun-violence.  Boykin says that UN ‘peacekeeper​s’​, would be more suited to patrolling the streets than the US National Guard because they are better “trained” for the role. ​[That means they are more likely to obey orders to shoot Americans.] ​Earlier this year, President Trump suggested deploying the National Guard in troubled areas of Chicago, but his idea was fiercely opposed by Democrats. ​-GEG​

Cook County Commissioner Richard Boykin is in talks with United Nations officials to explore the possibility of putting UN troops on the streets of Chicago to address the city’s horrendous gun violence problem.

Boykin flew to New York last week to meet with UN assistant secretary-general for peacebuilding support, Oscar Fernandez-Taranco to discuss the issue.

“The United Nations has a track record of protecting minority populations,” Boykin said before the meeting. “There was tribal warfare between the Tutsis and the Hutus in Africa, and they deployed peacekeeping troops there to help save those populations and reduce the bloodshed. We have to do something — black people in Chicago make up 30 percent of the population but 80 percent of those who are killed by gun violence.”

Boykin said that UN peacekeepers would be more suited to patrolling the streets than the U.S. National Guard because they are better “trained” for the role.

Mayor Rahm Emanuel did not directly address any potential role for the United Nations in Chicago when asked by reporters.

The idea of deploying UN peacekeepers on U.S. soil is likely to rile many on the right who have warned about international forces conducting gun confiscation operations domestically for decades.

Earlier this year, President Trump suggested deploying the National Guard in troubled areas of Chicago, but his idea was fiercely opposed by Democrats.

Read full article here…




​Lead BLM Investigator Blows Whistle, Exposes Gov’t Conspiracy Against Bundy Family

Nevada: Larry Wooten, a lead investigator for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) of its 2014 attempt to force ​the Bundy family off their cattle ranch, submitted a memo to the Department of Justice that exposed BLM bias, corruption, and persecution of the Bundy family. The memo included the fact that the BLM failed to turn over important evidence to the prosecutor as is required by law. This was evidence that could have helped the defense of 19 defendants who consequently have spent two years in prison. ​-GEG​

Bunkerville, NV — The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) lead investigator into the failed Bundy Ranch operation that took place April of 2014 has blown the whistle in an effort to expose far-reaching misconduct, recklessness, corruption and unrestrained persecutory behavior toward the Bundy family.

The Bundys and other defendants are currently on trial for conspiring to stop federal authorities from confiscating family cattle after Cliven Bundy failed to pay grazing fees and fines for years. They’re also facing charges relating to using or carrying a firearm in a crime of violence, threatening a federal law enforcement officer, obstruction of justice and extortion. Their trial began Nov. 14 in Las Vegas.

The incident saw hundreds of armed militiamen, and others, show up to defend the Bundy ranch after armed BLM sniper teams took up positions around the Bundy ranch property.

A damning memo from lead investigator Larry Wooten reveals borderline criminal operation carried out by the BLM.

According to a report by The Oregonian:

The memo comes from Larry Wooten, who had been the lead case agent and investigator for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management after the tense confrontation outside the patriarch’s ranch near Bunkerville. Wooten also testified before a federal grand jury that returned indictments against the Bundys. He said he was removed from the investigation last February after he complained to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Nevada…

 

Then last Wooten sent a whistleblower email to the U.S. Department of Justice, alleging a “widespread pattern of bad judgment, lack of discipline, incredible bias, unprofessionalism and misconduct, as well as likely policy, ethical and legal violations among senior and supervisory staff” at the Bureau of Land Management’s Office of Law Enforcement and Security.

 

Wooten wrote that supervisory agents with the bureau repeatedly mocked the defendants in an “amateurish carnival atmosphere” that resembled something out of middle school, displayed “clear prejudice” against the Bundys, their supporters and Mormons, and prominently displayed degrading altered booking photos of Cliven Bundy and other defendants in a federal office and in an office presentation.

 

The memo described “heavy handedness” by government officers as they prepared to impound Cliven Bundy’s cattle. He said some officers “bragged about roughing up Dave Bundy, grinding his face into the ground and Dave Bundy having little bits of gravel stuck in his face.” Dave Bundy, one of Cliven Bundy’s sons, was arrested April 6, 2014, while videotaping men he suspected were federal agents near his father’s ranch.

 

Wooten contends that supervisory agents failed to turn over required discovery evidence to the prosecution team that could help the defense or be used to question the credibility of a witness, as required by law.

The revelations contained in the memo prompted Cliven Bundy’s attorney to file a motion to dismiss the case, which is already in shambles over the government’s failure to share evidence with the defense as required by law.

The judge subsequently sent the jury home for more than a week in an effort to determine the validity of the claims, as the prosecution scrambled to save their case against the Bundy ranch defendants.

Additionally, lead agents on the case “instigated” monitoring of jail phone calls without the consent of the U.S. Attorney’s Office or the FBI – essentially going rogue – until Nevada’s acting U.S. attorney Steven Myhre, who is leading the prosecution, put an end to the illicit surveillance.

The memo by Wooten accused special agent-in-charge of the Bunkerville/Gold Butte operation for the BLM, Dan Love, of intentionally ignoring U.S. Attorney’s Office directives and his BLM superiors “in order to command the most intrusive, oppressive, large-scale and militaristic trespass cattle impound possible.”

Read full article here…




EU Commissioner Says Mass Third World Immigration Must Be the ‘New Norm’

Dimitris Avramopoulos, the EU Commissioner for Migration, wrote an article entitled “Europe’s Migrants Are Here to Stay” that suggests that EU globalists have committed European countries to mass migration “for the long haul.”  The EU claims that it is necessary for Europe’s economy to continue importing people from poor third-world countries. However, people from non-European backgrounds living in Europe are much more likely to be unemployed or low wage earners​.  Avramopoulos failed to acknowledge that newcomers will need to be provided with education, health care, shelter, food, and vocational training.  The goal of the globalists is to mix people from divergent cultures in order to destroy national identity and create internal conflict. This eliminates the once-proud and independent nation states and makes them easy to absorb into a global welfare and police state.  -GEG

Brussels has said that Europeans must accept mass migration from the third world as the “new norm”, warning that neither walls nor policies will allow any part of the EU to remain “homogenous and migration-free”.

“It’s time to face the truth. We cannot and will never be able to stop migration,” writes EU Commissioner for Migration Dimitris Avramopoulos, in a piece for POLITICO, published Monday entitled, “Europe’s Migrants Are Here to Stay”.

In it, the Eurocrat wrote “human mobility will increasingly define the 21st century”, and that mass migration is an issue Brussels has committed Europe to “for the long haul”, stating: “Migration is deeply intertwined with our policies on economics, trade, education and employment — to name just a few.”

Pointing to migrants from the world’s poorest countries who were granted refugee status in Europe, Avramopoulos made clear that Brussels sees asylum not as a way to offer temporary respite from war but instead as another method of permanently transplanting third world populations into EU nations.

 “They have found safety in Europe, but we also need to make sure they find a home,” he writes of refugees, going on to insist that programming Europeans to welcome mass migration is “not only a moral imperative”, but “also an economic and social imperative for our aging continent — and one of the biggest challenges for the near future”.

To this end, the Commission is working to “enhance legal channels for economic migration with a more ambitious Blue Card for highly skilled workers and kick-start targeted labour migration pilot projects in key third countries”, he notes.

Whilst Brussels claims that the Blue Card will bring “highly-skilled workers” to Europe, Breitbart London reported last year that revisions to the scheme clearly contradict this, stating that it would be necessary to provide newcomers with education, employment, and vocational training.

Read full article here…