Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel to Issue ID Cards to Illegal Aliens

Democrat Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, is rolling out identification cards, called ‘City Keys’, for illegal aliens residing in his city so they can feel comfortable to “drive their child to school, and all the benefits they have, to be part of the city.”  Chicago is mired in debt, the middle class is fleeing and crime is increasing.  Tucker Carlson says that all illegal aliens receive welfare and/or public assistance through taxpayer-funded schools, emergency treatment in hospitals, use of roads, tax benefits for children and more.  The US allows over one-million immigrants into the US every year.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel unveiled a new ID program he says is designed to welcome the “undocumented” community and people “on the sidelines” into the city.

The program will give a municipal “City Key” to anyone in Chicago. It is designed to give a person who doesn’t have an ID or a driver’s license essentially the same benefits as those who do.

“If you want somebody who’s undocumented to feel comfortable to be able to drive their child to school and all the benefits, they have to be part of the city,” Emanuel said.

Critics of the program say it might be a way for undocumented workers or people illegally in the U.S. to obtain a valid ID.

“Why would the city, in the middle of the various crises it’s facing, take all this time and all this money to serve the needs of people who are in the country illegally over citizens?” Tucker Carlson asked immigration attorney Francisco Hernandez on his program tonight.

Hernandez said that illegal immigrants have risked their lives to get to the U.S., and this is a way for them to “sign the guestbook,” get documented and join the community.

Carlson pointed out that many of the illegal immigrants who are working in the U.S. are doing so with fake Social Security cards and federal documents, which is a felony.

Read full article here…

Leftists Threaten to ‘Take the Streets’ If Mueller Is Fired from His Investigation into Trump

Former President Obama’s White House ethics lawyer, Walter Schaub, has ​warned of “taking to the streets” in case Robert Mueller is fired from the special investigation. He and other Democrats believe Trump may fire Mueller over the holidays., a leftist organization funded by George Soros, ​responded on its web site by ​posting plans to roll out nationwide ‘rapid response’ rallies that will begin hours after news breaks of a Mueller firing.   Trump’s White House ​lawyer says flatly that Mueller will not be fired. -GEG

The Alt-Left group is planning to roll out massive nationwide ‘rapid response,’ rallies, that “will begin hours after news breaks of a Mueller firing,” according to a new event post on the group’s official website.

According to the post, “Donald Trump is publicly considering firing special counsel Robert Mueller” which the group feels is just an effort to conceal illicit activities with the Russians, despite the fact that both Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director Robert Muller were actually involved in the embezzlement of U.S. Uranium, as reported by Intellihub in the bombshell piece titled “Hillary Clinton requested FBI Dir. Mueller deliver highly enriched uranium to the Russians in 2009 in secret ‘plane-side tarmac meeting.’ 

Now the snowflakes at are saying that it would be a “constitutional crisis” if Trump were to fire Mueller and vow to hold emergency “Nobody Is Above the Law” rallies in all 50 states.

Read Intellihub article here…

New ​ Study Proves CIA Supplied Weapons to ISIS

The mainstream media is just now reporting on US weapons that were delivered by the CIA to ISIS, even though Conflict Armament Research, a UK-based independent research organization, has been ​publishing these findings for years. CAR’s latest report is the result of a three-year investigation that compiled findings from 40,000 military items recovered from ISIS between the years 2014 and 2017.  ​This study, which was scientific, exhaustive, and irrefutable, confirms previous reports that the US and its allies have been the principle supplier of weapons to ISIS. In other words, ISIS is the creation of the US Deep State. In response to recent public awareness of this fact, President Trump ended the CIA weapons program, but there has been no discussion about preventing the military from taking over where the CIA leaves off. [The Deep State remains, so we expect the support of ISIS or other terrorist groups to continue. Why? Because you can’t fight a war on terrorism unless you have terrorists.] -GEG

  • Mainstream media in 2013: “Conspiracy Theorists!” 
  • Mainstream media in 2017: “ISIS Got a Powerful Missile the CIA Bought!” 

Years late to the party, mainstream media outlets like USA Today, Reuters, and Buzzfeed are just out with “breaking” and “exclusive” stories detailing how a vast arsenal of weapons sent to Syria by the CIA in cooperation with US allies fueled the rapid growth of ISIS. Buzzfeed’s story entitled, Blowback: ISIS Got A Powerful Missile The CIA Secretly Bought In Bulgaria, begins by referencing “a new report on how ISIS built its arsenal highlights how the US purchased munitions, intended for Syrian rebels, that ended up in the hands of the terrorist group.”

The original study that Buzzfeed and other media are referencing comes from a UK-based independent weapons research organization called Conflict Armament Research (CAR) which has had a team of weapons and munitions experts on the ground in the Middle East for years examining arms and equipment recovered from ISIS and other terrorist groups in Iraq and Syria. Using serial numbers, crate shipping markings, and all available forensics data, the CAR experts began finding that as early as 2013 to 2014 much of the Islamic State’s advanced weapons systems as well as small arms were clearly sourced to the United States and the West.

“Supplies of materiel into the Syrian conflict from foreign parties – notably the United States and Saudi Arabia – have indirectly allowed IS to obtain substantial quantities of anti-armor ammunition,” states the CAR report. “These weapons include anti-tank guided weapons and several varieties of rocket with tandem warheads, which are designed to defeat modern reactive armor.”

A PG-9 missile modified to fit a Model 2 recoilless launcher system. Produced in 2016 in Romania, exported to the United States and documented in Mosul in September 2017. Source: Conflict Armament Research

The study further reveals that in one notable instance, a weapons shipment of advanced missile systems switched hands from US intelligence to “moderate” Syrian groups to ISIS in only a two month time period. Though the report is now evoking shock and confusion among pundits, the same weapons research group has actually published similar findings and conclusions going years back into the Syrian conflict.

For example, a previous 2014 Conflict Armament Research report found that Balkan origin anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters appeared identical to those shipped in 2013 to Syrian rebel forces as part of a CIA program.

And CAR’s damning publications presenting such inconvenient empirical data have been consistent for years, yet were largely ignored and suppressed by analysts and mainstream media who were too busy cheerleading US support for Syrian “rebels” cast as romantic revolutionaries in their struggle to topple Assad and his secular nationalist government. Of course, it’s an old story if you’ve been reading Zero Hedge or the profusion of independent outlets that have long reported the truth about the covert “dirty war” in Syria since nearly the beginning.

Even though it’s now suddenly acceptable and fashionable to admit – as does one recent BBC headline (“The Jihadis You Pay For”) – that the US and Saudi covert program in Syria fuelled the rise of ISIS and various other al-Qaeda linked terror groups, it must be remembered that only a short time ago the mainstream media openly mocked analysts and writers who dared make the connection between the West’s massive covert Syrian rebel aid programs and the al-Qaeda insurgents who so clearly benefited.

When news of the 2012 Defense Intelligence Agency report  broke, which described what it called a “Salafist principality” or “an Islamic State” as a strategic asset or buffer in Syria that could be used by the Western coalition “in order to isolate the Syrian regime”, American media outlets dismissed what was labelled a “conspiracy theory” at the time in spite of the hard evidence of a US military intelligence report being made available.

The Daily Beast for example mocked what it called “The ISIS Conspiracy Theory that Ate the Web” – describing those analyzing the Pentagon intelligence document as far-right and far-left loons. This occurred even as the document was taken very seriously and analyzed in-depth by some of the world’s foremost Middle East experts and investigative journalists in foreign outlets like the London Review of BooksThe GuardianDer Spiegal , as well as RT and Al Jazeera.

Read full article here…

Spain: Antifa Activist Beat Man to Death for Wearing Suspenders the Same Colors as Spanish Flag

Spain: Rodrigo Lanza, an Antifa activist from Chile, beat a man to death with a metal rod for wearing suspenders that were the color of the Spanish flag.  Lanza is part of the Barcelona squatter movement, a leftist crime ​organization. He previously ​served five years in prison for attacking a policeman who was trying to evict him and other squatters from a building.  T​he attack left the police officer as a quadriplegic. -GEG​

A 55-year-old man died in Zaragoza on Tuesday night as a result of the beating he received outside a bar last week by a leftist radical who didn’t like the suspenders he was wearing; they were in the colors of the Spanish flag.

The alleged attacker, a 33-year-old member of the Barcelona squatter movement named Rodrigo Lanza, had already served a five-year sentence for assaulting a local police officer in the Catalan capital; that victim has been a quadriplegic since 2006.

This latest assault took place at around 2.30am in the early hours of Friday outside El Tocadiscos, a bar located on Antonio Agustín street, in Zaragoza’s old town district, the local daily Heraldo de Aragón reported.

Víctor Láinez, 55, got into an argument with a group of people inside the bar. He was alone at the time. Witnesses said that the attacker and three other individuals began yelling at Láinez and calling him a “facha,” short for “fascist,” because of the red and yellow stripes on his suspenders.

When Láinez walked out of the bar, two individuals came running after him. Witnesses said that Lanza struck the victim on the head with a metal bar; he and his accomplice then kicked the man several times as he lay unconscious on the ground before running away.

Read full article here…

​Why ​ George Soros Promoted ​and Funded ​ Net Neutrality

Dr. Jerome Corsi explains that George Soros promoted net neutrality through the FCC because it prevents the FCC from ending political censorship by content carriers like Google, Facebook,​ and Twitter, all of which engage in anti-conservative censorship.  Ajit Pai, Chairman of the FCC, who ​challenged the net-neutrality fraud​, finally ​made it possible for the FCC to break monopolies, enforce the First Amendment and prevent censorship​. Now we shall see if it actually does these things. -GEG

Attorney Lisa Bloom, Gloria Allred’s Daughter, Offered to Pay Woman $750K to Accuse Trump

Lisa Bloom, a California lawyer and daughter of Gloria Allred, who also represents Trump accusers, arranged payments for women to publicly accuse Donald Trump of sexual misconduct before the election.  Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell the story to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off the accuser’s mortgage, and attempting to secure as much as $750,000 to another woman who ultimately declined.  The unidentified woman had an email from Bloom indicating that a Clinton Super PAC would help finance her legal costs if she agreed to do it.  Earlier this year, Bloom was shamed into dropping Harvey Weinstein, asexual predator and alleged rapist, as a client. -GEG

A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump during the final months of the 2016 presidential race, according to documents and interviews.

California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.

The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.

Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.

In a statement to The Hill, Bloom acknowledged she engaged in discussions to secure donations for women who made or considered making accusations against Trump before last year’s election.

“Donors reached out to my firm directly to help some of the women I represented,” said Bloom, whose clients have also included accusers of Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly.

Bloom said her goal in securing money was not to pressure the women to come forward, but rather to help them relocate or arrange security if they felt unsafe during the waning days of a vitriolic election. She declined to identify any of the donors.

And while she noted she represented sexual harassment victims for free or at reduced rates, she also acknowledged a standard part of her contracts required women to pay her commissions as high as 33 percent if she sold their stories to media outlets.

“Our standard pro bono agreement for legal services provides that if a media entity offers to compensate a client for sharing his or her story we receive a percentage of those fees. This rarely happens. But, on occasion, a case generates media interest and sometimes (not always) a client may receive an appearance fee,” she said.

“As a private law firm we have significant payroll, rent, taxes, insurance and other expenses every week, so an arrangement where we might receive some compensation to defray our costs seems reasonable to us and is agreed to by our clients,” Bloom added.

Bloom told The Hill she had no contact with Clinton or her campaign, but declined to address any contacts with super PACs that supported the Democratic presidential nominee.

Josh Schwerin, the communications director for Priorities USA Action, the largest pro-Clinton super PAC, told The Hill that the group had no relationship with Bloom and had no discussions with her about supporting Trump accusers.

One Bloom client who received financial help from Bloom was New York City makeup artist Jill Harth.

The former beauty contestant manager filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against Trump in 1997 and then withdrew it under pressure. The news media discovered the litigation during the election, and Harth’s name became public in the summer of 2016. She asked Bloom to represent her in the fall after hearing Trump describe her allegations against him as false, and became a vocal critic of Trump.

“I consider myself lucky to have had Lisa Bloom by my side after my old lawsuit resurfaced. She advised me with great competence and compassion,” Harth told The Hill.

Harth said she did not originally ask Bloom for money, even though her cosmetics business suffered from the notoriety of the campaign stories about her.

But later, Bloom arranged a small payment from the licensing of some photos to the news media, and then set up a account to raise money for Harth in October 2016. “Jill put herself out there, facing off with Donald Trump. Let’s show her some love,” the online fundraising appeal set up by Bloom’s husband declared.

The effort raised a little over $2,300.

Bloom then arranged for a donor to make a larger contribution to help Harth pay off the mortgage on her Queens apartment in New York City. The amount was under $30,000, according to a source directly familiar with Harth’s situation. Public records show Harth’s mortgage was recorded as extinguished on Dec. 19, 2016.

Harth said the payments did not affect the merits of her allegations. She alleges that during a January 1993 meeting at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, the future president pushed her up against a wall and groped her, trying to get his hands up her dress.

“Nothing that you’ve said to me about my mortgage or the Go Fund Me that was created to help me out financially affects the facts or the veracity of my 1997 federal complaint against Donald J. Trump for sexual harassment and assault,” she told The Hill.

“Having to retell my experiences of Donald Trump’s harassment is the hardest thing I’ve ever had to do.”

Trump has steadfastly denied assaulting or harassing women, even after a videotape surfaced in September 2016 in which he can be heard boasting that famous men like him can grab women by the genitalia without consequence. Trump has dismissed the tape as “locker room talk.”

Harth is currently writing a memoir about her whole experience, but without Bloom’s help.

Bloom acknowledged arranging financial help for Harth, who she said had lost income because of the publicity surrounding her allegations.

“She endured a tidal wave of hate for it. It was very painful for her. And as a New York City makeup artist, Jill lost jobs after she came out publicly against Donald Trump. I believed that people wanted to donate to help her, so we set up the GoFundMe account,” she told The Hill.

The Hill does not identify the names of victims of sexual assault or harassment unless they go public on their own, like Harth.

But one woman who did not go public with allegations agreed to share her documents and talk to The Hill about her interactions with Bloom if The Hill honored its commitment to maintain her anonymity.

Both that woman and Harth, who were friends, stressed that Bloom never asked them to make any statements or allegations except what they believed to be true.

Their texts and emails indicate Bloom held a strong dislike of Trump though. Bloom is the daughter of Gloria Allred, another prominent attorney who is representing a number of women who have made accusations of sexual misconduct against Trump.

In an email to the unnamed woman, Bloom said that her story was “further evidence of what a sick predator this man is,” referring to Trump.

Documents also show Bloom’s efforts to get alleged victims of sexual assault or harassment to come out against Trump intensified as Election Day 2016 approached.

When Harth, for instance, informed Bloom she had just made a Facebook post urging other women to come forward about Trump in October 2016, the lawyer texted back: “Wow Jill that would be amazing. 27 days until the election.”

And when a potential client abruptly backed out of a pre-election news conference in which she was supposed to allege she was sexually assaulted at age 13, Bloom turned her attention to another woman.

That woman, Harth’s friend, went back and forth for weeks with Bloom in 2016 about going public with an allegation of an unsolicited advance by Trump on the 1990s beauty contest circuit.

“Give us a clear sense of what you need and we will see if it we can get it,” Bloom texted the woman a week before Election Day.

“I’m scared Lisa. I can’t relocate. I don’t like taking other people’s money,” the woman wrote to Bloom.

“Ok let’s not do this then,” Bloom responded. “We are just about out of time anyway.”

The woman then texted back demanding to know why there was a deadline. “What does time have to do with this? Time to bury Trump??? You want my story to bury trump for what? Personal gain? See that ‘s why I have trust issues!!”

Read full article here…

A Beginner’s Guide to Bitcoin and Blockchain

Find out what the blockchain is, why the price of Bitcoin has exploded, how to buy and store Bitcoin, and how the banks are maneuvering to dominate the system.  This is not a recommendation to buy Bitcoin, but a guide for what to expect should you decide to do so. [We believe that lots of money will be made and lost in the early stages of cryptocurrency. The more you know about it, the better your chances are for success. If you decide to speculate, our advice is (1) do not risk more than you can afford to lose, and (2) routinely withdraw some of your gains as you go rather than let it all accumulate.] -GEG

Bitcoin has risen by about 1700% in 2017, which averaged more than 100% per month! There are thousands of Youtube videos about cryptocurrencies and blockchain, and we are including a few to help untangle some of the mysteries of the new technology.

The first 2-minute video explains how blockchain is an accounting system used for trade between peers. It is a system, like a ledger,​ that can accept new data without changing prior data. Parties who are trading with each other do not need to trust each other but only need to trust the system. Experts warn that ICO (initial coin offerings) are currently over-hyped on a large scale.

The price of Bitcoin has gone through the roof, hitting over $20,000 per coin. Bitcoin was created to have a set limit of 21 million coins; more than 16.7 million already have ​been created. One of the major reasons its value has exploded in recent weeks is
​increased speculation on other cryptocurrencies which, at this time, can only be purchased with Bitcoin. The author of this article from ZeroHedge says Bitcoin will keep rising for this reason.

Here is an essential chart from that lists the top​ 100 traded cryptocurrencies, their price, trading volume, number of coins in circulation and market capitalization.

This next video explains Bitcoin’s new ‘Lightening Network’ that will allow off-chain trading between peers. This is increasingly important, because Bitcoin can process only 7 transactions per second with the current 1-megabyte block size. For comparison, Visa averages 4,000 transactions per second and can scale up to​ 65,000 transactions per second. This is a serious limitation that, unless overcome, will prevent Bitcoin from ever becoming a viable cryptocurrency in everyday commerce.​

The Lightning Network hopes to solve this problem by allowing users to trade with each other outside of the blockchain system if they both have a certain amount of Bitcoin stored in a multi-signature ​online ​address that acts like an escrow​ safe that can be opened only ​when both parties agree and sign off with their private keys.
​There would be no limit to the amount of transactions per second​, because they occur entirely outside the blockchain. Either party can close the payment channel at any time by broadcasting the balance sheet on the blockchain network​​, which will
trigger the actual ​release of funds.  It is set for roll-out in 2018.

A YouTuber who goes by the handle ‘Decentralized Thought’ explains how Bitcoin has been infiltrated by
​banks and other institutions that hope to profit from transaction fees. These players are taking advantage of the slow rate of Bitcoin transactions. One scheme to justify handling fees is the idea that those who pay the fee will go to the head of the line. People who pay higher fees go to the front of the line​, while others wait … and wait.​

Instead of raising the block size, as was ​intended by the original design, the Bitcoin​ development team adopted the ‘Lightning Network’, which acts like an I.O.U. that promises very fast transactions with fees​charged only when payment channels are closed and settled. The problem​, however, ​is that payment channels must be pre-loaded with money to draw against, like pre-paid phone cards, and this would have to be done with everyone from whom you purchase anything.

Not a workable solution.​

The Lightning Network solution is the creation of payment’ hubs’ consisting of many buyers and sellers clustered around institutions that will clear all your transactions through their own accounts. That way, you can work from only one pre-payment account, much like a checking account with a bank.

​Hubs are expected to occur naturally, but they will no longer be private. All transaction data will be accessible, all transactions will still carry a fee, and the hubs will be subject to the same government regulations now applied to banks. In fact, it is expected that the banks of today merely will morph into the transaction hubs of tomorrow.

B​anks are not fighting cryptocurrency because they intend to be the cryptocurrency administrators of the future.

According to ‘Decentralized Thought’, the 1-megabyte blocks that are restricting Bitcoin are ​being maintained ​purposely by developers in order to create transaction fees and long wait times that create pressure for a solution the banking industry will like.

The block size restriction was placed as a temporary safeguard by Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. As soon as the blocks were full, the number was supposed to be raised again. Satoshi Nakamoto, the name used by the unidentified creator/s of Bitcoin, left the project in 2010, but left instructions on how to raise the block size​,​ and Gavin Andresen was put in charge of the project.  Once Satoshi left, however, ​the banks entered the system, and a company called ‘Blockstream’ emerged. A large part of the Bitcoin development team was hired by this company and they soon agreed not to increase the block size, ​in spite of that being the original design.

He says that Blockstream took control of the development of Bitcoin through censorship, organized attacks​,​ and manipulation. Those developers who opposed them were forced out of the company. The blockchain will not be ​expanded because Blockstream has said ​it plans​ to sell side chains to businesses to overcome the processing delay​.

The system that was designed to give freedom, stability and power to the people of the world has been ​hijacked.

This last video features Cody Zazulak who speculates in cryptocurrencies, explaining how to buy Bitcoin and store it. He uses the trading chart by GDAX and the list to check prices and movement.

He purchases Bitcoin from Coinbase and then removes it from the exchange because exchanges are a massive hacking target. He stores small amounts of money in ‘Blockchain’, an online wallet for small amounts. Blockchain wallets only store Bitcoin and Etherium.

For larger amounts, Cody uses Exodus, a desktop wallet that he says is pretty safe. Your currency can be easily converted from Bitcoin into Etherium, Litecoin and more.

Finally, he describes offline hardware wallets that are safest storage option that can be unplugged from your computer- the top brands are Trezor, Keep Key and Ledger. Good luck buying this gadget as the companies may be sold out of the product.

In the last part of the Cody’s presentation, he explains how to make interest from loaning your money to BitConnect, a cryptocurrency company.  Caution: Financial experts at Motley Fool say that BitConnect is similar to a pyramid scheme.

Hopefully, this ​information will help people to avoid the pitfalls of using this new technology.