The ​Ugly ​Truth About Net Neutrality: Google and Facebook Will Be Exempt from Regulations

Wiki
image_pdfimage_print
LeeAnn McAdoo explains that so-called Net Neutrality is a scam.  It targets signal carriers, like Verizon and AT&T for strict regulations while content carriers, like Facebook, Google and Youtube, are exempt.  They scare the public into thinking that ‘net neutrality’ will protect them from being gouged by high priced, multi-tier bandwidth packages. [Incidentally, there is much to be said for ‘pay for use’ pricing, because it does not force the casual user of emails to pay for service to the movie addict.]  On the other hand, under Net Neutrality rules, Facebook and Google are able to censor information knowing that Verizon and AT&T are forced to carry their output.  George Soros and the Ford Foundation spent an estimated $72 million since 2006 to control the Internet and ​they also support Net Neutrality which, to them, is merely a slogan to gain support from those who do not understand the deeper issues of fair cost and censorship.  In 2015, Obama’s Net Neutrality rules went into effect, and censorship on platforms like Facebook, Google and Youtube rapidly increased.  Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Alphabet, the parent company of Google, announced that Googles oon will make it difficult for the public to find any news source they wish to censor – all in the name of fighting hate speech and fake news, of course.. [Orwell would be proud.] -GEG

Related Post

Visit our Classified ads.

Check out our Classified ads at the bottom of this page.

Recent stories & commentary

Classifieds

For classified advertising rates and terms, click here. The appearance of ads on this site does not signify endorsement by the publisher. We do not attempt to verify the accuracy of statements made therein or vouch for the integrity of advertisers. However, we will investigate complaints from readers and remove any message we find to be misleading or that promotes anything fraudulent, illegal, or unethical.

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
MJ Raichyk, PhD Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
MJ Raichyk, PhD
Guest
MJ Raichyk, PhD

The conclusion is not supported by the argument!! Clearly the answer is to recognize that google and facebook are such dominant players on the web that they should be as regulated by old-phone rules as ol ma-bell…

Pai instead wants to let the whole bunch of wolves loose….. We should stop Pai with a Soros-defeating expansion of the rules to google and facebook…

Google for one has no real competition at this time and google is THE face of the internet that is its backbone… ditto with facebook….. probably youtube as well….